Linux S390: System z9 mainframe
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 03/15] smc: establish pnet table management
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 02/15] smc: establish new socket family
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 01/15] net: introduce keepalive function in struct proto
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next: s390 crash due to 's390: move sys_call_table and last_break from thread_info to thread_struct'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next: s390 crash due to 's390: move sys_call_table and last_break from thread_info to thread_struct'
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next: s390 crash due to 's390: move sys_call_table and last_break from thread_info to thread_struct'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] net/iucv: use explicit clean up labels in iucv_init()
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 04/15] smc: introduce SMC as an IB-client
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 00/15] net/smc: Shared Memory Communications - RDMA
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 01/15] net: introduce keepalive function in struct proto
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 02/15] smc: establish new socket family
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 06/15] smc: connection and link group creation
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 09/15] smc: initialize IB transport incl. PD, MR, QP, CQ, event, WR
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 08/15] smc: work request (WR) base for use by LLC and CDC
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 07/15] smc: remote memory buffers (RMBs)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 10/15] smc: link layer control (LLC)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 12/15] smc: send data (through RDMA)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 11/15] smc: connection data control (CDC)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 14/15] smc: socket closing and linkgroup cleanup
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 15/15] smc: netlink interface for SMC sockets
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 03/15] smc: establish pnet table management
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V3 net-next 05/15] smc: CLC handshake (incl. preparation steps)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/20 v2] net/iucv: Convert to hotplug state machine
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL
- From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/20] net/iucv: Convert to hotplug state machine
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/20] net/iucv: Convert to hotplug state machine
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] iommu/s390: drop duplicate header pci.h
- From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/zcrypt: Convert to PM ops
- From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 02/15] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] s390/crypto: unlock on error in prng_tdes_read()
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch] s390/crypto: unlock on error in prng_tdes_read()
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/20] net/iucv: Convert to hotplug state machine
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 05/15] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_rport() helper
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 04/15] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_shost() helper
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 02/15] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 12/15] scsi: fc: use bsg_job_done
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 09/15] scsi: change FC drivers to use 'struct bsg_job'
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 03/15] scsi: fc: Export fc_bsg_jobdone and use it in FC drivers
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [tip:locking/core] locking/core: Provide common cpu_relax_yield() definition
- From: tip-bot for Christian Borntraeger <tipbot@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [bug report] s390/time: steer clocksource on STP sync events
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next: s390 crash due to 's390: move sys_call_table and last_break from thread_info to thread_struct'
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- next: s390 crash due to 's390: move sys_call_table and last_break from thread_info to thread_struct'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL v2 1/5] processor.h: introduce cpu_relax_yield
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL v2 1/5] processor.h: introduce cpu_relax_yield
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL v2 1/5] processor.h: introduce cpu_relax_yield
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL v2 1/5] processor.h: introduce cpu_relax_yield
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL v2 0/5] cpu_relax: drop lowlatency, introduce yield
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3.16 135/346] s390: Define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH for ARCH_DLINFO
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3.2 049/152] s390: Define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH for ARCH_DLINFO
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized
- From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/11] [v3] infiniband: shut up a maybe-uninitialized warning
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/11] crypto: aesni: shut up -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/11] nios2: fix timer initcall return value
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/11] NFSv4.1: work around -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/11] Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings by default
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/11] [media] rc: print correct variable for z8f0811
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/11] x86: apm: avoid uninitialized data
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/11] Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for "make W=1"
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/11] [media] dib0700: fix nec repeat handling
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/11] s390: pci: don't print uninitialized data for debugging
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/11] pcmcia: fix return value of soc_pcmcia_regulator_set
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] cputime: some optimizations and cleanups
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] two bug fixes for 4.9-rc5
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390: squash facilities_src.h into gen_facilities.c
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390: delete unneeded #include <linux/kconfig.h> from facilities_src.h
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390: remove unneeded dependency for gen_facilities
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390: remove unneeded dependency for gen_facilities
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390: remove unneeded dependency for gen_facilities
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390: delete unneeded #include <linux/kconfig.h> from facilities_src.h
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390: squash facilities_src.h into gen_facilities.c
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390: squash facilities_src.h into gen_facilities.c
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390: delete unneeded #include <linux/kconfig.h> from facilities_src.h
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390: squash facilities_src.h into gen_facilities.c
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390: squash facilities_src.h into gen_facilities.c
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] s390: delete unneeded #include <linux/kconfig.h> from facilities_src.h
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] s390: squash facilities_src.h into gen_facilities.c
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init
- From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/25 v2] s390/smp: Convert to hotplug state machine
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/25 v2] s390/smp: Make cpu notifier symetric
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/25] s390/smp: Convert to hotplug state machine
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/25] s390/smp: Make cpu notifier symetric
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 13/16] scsi: fc: use bsg_job_done
- From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 10/16] scsi: change FC drivers to use 'struct bsg_job'
- From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/16] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_rport() helper
- From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/16] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_shost() helper
- From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 04/16] scsi: Unify interfaces of fc_bsg_jobdone and bsg_job_done
- From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] scsi: fc: Export fc_bsg_jobdone and use it in FC drivers
- From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 04/16] scsi: Unify interfaces of fc_bsg_jobdone and bsg_job_done
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] scsi: fc: Export fc_bsg_jobdone and use it in FC drivers
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/25] s390/smp: Make cpu notifier symetric
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/25] s390/smp: Convert to hotplug state machine
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] cputime/powerpc: remove cputime_to_scaled()
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] cputime/powerpc: remove cputime_last_delta global variable
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] cputime/powerpc/s390: make scaled cputime arch specific
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] cputime/powerpc/s390: make scaled cputime arch specific
- From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] cputime/powerpc/s390: make scaled cputime arch specific
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 02/11] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock()
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 03/11] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 04/11] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 05/11] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 08/11] x86, kvm/x86.c: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 10/11] x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 09/11] x86, kernel/kvm.c: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 11/11] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 07/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 01/11] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 00/11] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/4] cputime/powerpc/s390: make scaled cputime arch specific
- From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] cputime/powerpc/s390: make scaled cputime arch specific
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/4] cputime/powerpc/s390: make scaled cputime arch specific
- From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] cputime/powerpc/s390: make scaled cputime arch specific
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] cputime/powerpc: remove cputime_last_delta global variable
- From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] cputime: simplify task_cputime()
- From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] cputime/powerpc: remove cputime_to_scaled()
- From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] cputime/powerpc/s390: make scaled cputime arch specific
- From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] cputime: some optimizations and cleanups
- From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] s390: virtio: make ccw explicitly non-modular
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] s390: remove modular usage from non-modular code
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/9] s390: remove modular usage from non-modular code
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/9] s390: char: make zcore explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/9] s390: char: make con3215 explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/9] s390: char: make slcp_quiesce explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] s390: hotplug: make pci_hpc explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/9] s390: hypfs: make inode explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/9] s390: kernel: make lgr explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 9/9] s390: virtio: make ccw explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/9] s390: char: make sclp_tty explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/9] s390: cio: make it explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] s390: char: make slp_ctl explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] s390: char: make slp_ctl explicitly non-modular
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] s390: char: make slp_ctl explicitly non-modular
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] s390: char: make slp_ctl explicitly non-modular
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] Add new builtin_misc_device users
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock()
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 10/11] x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 00/11] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: "Andreas Krebbel1" <Andreas.Krebbel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 01/11] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 02/11] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock()
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 03/11] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 04/11] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 05/11] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 08/11] x86, kvm/x86.c: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 11/11] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 10/11] x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 09/11] x86, kernel/kvm.c: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 07/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 00/11] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 1/1] KVM: s390: Fix STHYI buffer alignment for diag224
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: Fix for 4.9 (via kvm/master)
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: Fix for 4.9 (via kvm/master)
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL v2 1/5] processor.h: introduce cpu_relax_yield
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL v2 3/5] s390: make cpu_relax a barrier again
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL v2 0/5] cpu_relax: drop lowlatency, introduce yield
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL v2 5/5] processor.h: remove cpu_relax_lowlatency
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL v2 4/5] processor.h: Remove cpu_relax_lowlatency users
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL v2 2/5] stop_machine: yield CPU during stop machine
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] s390 patches for 4.9-rc3
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: "rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx" <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] stop_machine: yield CPU during stop machine
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
- From: xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] stop_machine: yield CPU during stop machine
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] stop_machine: yield CPU during stop machine
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: "rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx" <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] cpu_relax: introduce yield, remove lowlatency
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] cpu_relax: introduce yield, remove lowlatency
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] cpu_relax: introduce yield, remove lowlatency
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] stop_machine: yield CPU during stop machine
- From: Juergen Gross <lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] cpu_relax: introduce yield, remove lowlatency
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] stop_machine: yield CPU during stop machine
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 0/5] cpu_relax: introduce yield, remove lowlatency
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] Remove cpu_relax_lowlatency users
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] remove cpu_relax_lowlatency
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] s390: make cpu_relax a barrier again
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] stop_machine: yield CPU during stop machine
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] processor.h: introduce cpu_relax_yield
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: fix for 4.9 (via kvm/master)
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: fix for 4.9 (via kvm/master)
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: fix for 4.9 (via kvm/master)
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 1/1] KVM: s390: reject invalid modes for runtime instrumentation
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] s390/net: use net core MTU range checking
- From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 0/9] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 1/9] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 3/9] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 6/9] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 5/9] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 7/9] x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 8/9] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 4/9] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 2/9] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock()
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/10] mm: replace get_vaddr_frames() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: replace __access_remote_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: replace __access_remote_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: replace get_user_pages_locked() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: replace __access_remote_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: replace __access_remote_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: replace __access_remote_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: replace __access_remote_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/10] mm: replace get_user_pages() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm: replace get_user_pages_remote() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: replace get_user_pages_locked() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 0/5] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 4/5] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 3/5] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock()
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 1/5] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: replace get_user_pages_locked() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: replace get_user_pages_locked() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm: replace get_user_pages_unlocked() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: remove write/force parameters from __get_user_pages_unlocked()
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/10] mm: remove write/force parameters from __get_user_pages_locked()
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 25/28] s390: pci: don't print uninitialized data for debugging
- From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 25/28] s390: pci: don't print uninitialized data for debugging
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/28] Reenable maybe-uninitialized warnings
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 28/28] Kbuild: bring back -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 25/28] s390: pci: don't print uninitialized data for debugging
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/28] Reenable maybe-uninitialized warnings
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm: replace access_process_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/10] mm: replace get_user_pages() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390: mm: use hugetlb_bad_size()
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 07/12] s390/tracing: fix compat syscall handling
- From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] s390: mm: use hugetlb_bad_size()
- From: Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 04/16] scsi: Unify interfaces of fc_bsg_jobdone and bsg_job_done
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 03/16] scsi: fc: Export fc_bsg_jobdone and use it in FC drivers
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 06/16] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_rport() helper
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 05/16] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_shost() helper
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 13/16] scsi: fc: use bsg_job_done
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 10/16] scsi: change FC drivers to use 'struct bsg_job'
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net 0/3] s390 network driver patches
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/16] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_shost() helper
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags
- From: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] scsi: fc: use bsg_job_done
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] scsi: change FC drivers to use 'struct bsg_job'
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_rport() helper
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] scsi: Unify interfaces of fc_bsg_jobdone and bsg_job_done
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] scsi: fc: Export fc_bsg_jobdone and use it in FC drivers
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] Convert FibreChannel bsg code to use bsg-lib
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: remove write/force parameters from __get_user_pages_unlocked()
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/10] mm: replace get_user_pages_locked() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/10] mm: replace access_process_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/10] mm: replace get_user_pages() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/10] mm: replace get_vaddr_frames() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/10] mm: replace __access_remote_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/10] mm: replace access_remote_vm() write parameter with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/10] mm: replace get_user_pages_remote() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/10] mm: remove write/force parameters from __get_user_pages_unlocked()
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/10] mm: remove write/force parameters from __get_user_pages_locked()
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/10] mm: replace get_user_pages_unlocked() write/force parameters with gup_flags
- From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] Convert FibreChannel bsg code to use bsg-lib
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 15/15] smc: proc-fs interface for smc connections
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/16] scsi: fc: Export fc_bsg_jobdone and use it in FC drivers
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/16] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_shost() helper
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/16] scsi: Unify interfaces of fc_bsg_jobdone and bsg_job_done
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/16] scsi: fc: provide fc_bsg_to_rport() helper
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/16] scsi: change FC drivers to use 'struct bsg_job'
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 13/16] scsi: fc: use bsg_job_done
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 3/3] s390/lcs: remove trailing space at end of dev_err message
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 1/3] s390/netiucv: get rid of one memcpy in netiucv_printuser
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 0/3] s390 network driver patches
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 2/3] s390/netiucv: improve checking of sysfs attribute buffer
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net 0/2] s390: af_iucv patches
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/44] zfcp: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/44] zfcp: Use fc_bsg_jobdone()
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/44] scsi: Unify interfaces of fc_bsg_jobdone and bsg_job_done
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 25/44] zfcp: use fc_bsg_to_shost() to access a bsg_job's Scsi_Host
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 28/44] zfcp: use fc_bsg_to_rport() to access a bsg_job's rport
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 36/44] scsi: change FC drivers to use 'struct bsg_job'
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 41/44] scsi: fc: use bsg_job_done
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 06/11] s390/tracing: fix compat syscall handling
- From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] locking/osq: Provide proper lock/unlock and relaxed flavors
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 2/2] Subject: [PATCH] af_iucv: drop skbs rejected by filter
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 0/2] s390: af_iucv patches
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 1/2] Subject: [PATCH] af_iucv: enable control sends in case of SEND_SHUTDOWN
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
- From: Jason Low <jason.low2@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
- From: Jason Low <jason.low2@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] s390 patches for 4.9 merge window #1
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -resend 6/6] frv, mn10300, s390, sh: remove empty vga.h
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -resend 6/6] frv, mn10300, s390, sh: remove empty vga.h
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -resend 6/6] frv, mn10300, s390, sh: remove empty vga.h
- From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/1] s390 preparation for vcpu preempted check
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390x/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted globally
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390x/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted globally
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390x/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted globally
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/lcs: remove trailing space at end of dev_err message
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/dasd: add missing \n to end of dev_err messages
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] virtio/s390: add missing \n to end of dev_err message
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 15/15] smc: proc-fs interface for smc connections
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] virtio/s390: add missing \n to end of dev_err message
- From: Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/lcs: remove trailing space at end of dev_err message
- From: Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/dasd: add missing \n to end of dev_err messages
- From: Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 11/15] smc: connection data control (CDC)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 14/15] smc: socket closing and linkgroup cleanup
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 06/15] smc: connection and link group creation
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 08/15] smc: work request (WR) base for use by LLC and CDC
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 07/15] smc: remote memory buffers (RMBs)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 15/15] smc: proc-fs interface for smc connections
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 03/15] smc: establish pnet table management
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 12/15] smc: send data (through RDMA)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 09/15] smc: initialize IB transport incl. PD, MR, QP, CQ, event, WR
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 10/15] smc: link layer control (LLC)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 04/15] smc: introduce SMC as an IB-client
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 01/15] net: introduce keepalive function in struct proto
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 05/15] smc: CLC handshake (incl. preparation steps)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 02/15] smc: establish new socket family
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2 net-next 00/15] net/smc: Shared Memory Communications - RDMA
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Implement arch primitives for busywait loops
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Implement arch primitives for busywait loops
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390: migrate exception table users off module.h and onto extable.h
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Implement arch primitives for busywait loops
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Implement arch primitives for busywait loops
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390: migrate exception table users off module.h and onto extable.h
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net 0/7] 390: qeth patches
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/11] s390/tracing: fix compat syscall handling
- From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 7/7] s390/qeth: fix setting VIPA address
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 4/7] qeth: check not more than 16 SBALEs on the completion queue
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 2/7] s390/qeth: use ip_lock for hsuid configuration
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 3/7] s390/qeth: allow hsuid configuration in DOWN state
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 1/7] qeth: restore device features after recovery
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 6/7] qeth: do not turn on SG per default
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 5/7] qeth: do not limit number of gso segments
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 0/7] 390: qeth patches
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390: cleanup with list_first_entry_or_null()
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubsan: allow to disable the null sanitizer
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] ubsan for s390
- From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390: cleanup with list_first_entry_or_null()
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/2] atomic64: No need for CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] atomic64: No need for CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] s390/ubsan: enable UBSAN for s390
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] ubsan: allow to disable the null sanitizer
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] ubsan for s390
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] atomic64: No need for CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: s390/debug: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] atomic64: No need for CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] atomic64: No need for CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: features and fixes for 4.9 (via kvm/next)
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 01/11] KVM: s390: generate facility mask from readable list
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 03/11] KVM: s390: split store status and machine check handling
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 04/11] KVM: s390: fix delivery of vector regs during machine checks
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 07/11] KVM: s390: gaccess: simplify translation exception handling
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 09/11] KVM: s390: allow 255 VCPUs when sca entries aren't used
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 06/11] KVM: s390: guestdbg: separate defines for per code
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 11/11] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 08/11] KVM: s390: lazy enable RI
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 10/11] KVM: s390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 02/11] KVM: s390: factor out actual delivery of machine checks
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 05/11] KVM: s390: write external damage code on machine checks
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: features and fixes for 4.9 (via kvm/next)
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] uprobes: remove function declarations from arch/{mips,s390}
- From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/21] s390: mm: pfault: Convert to hotplug state machine
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH][V2] s390/crypto: initialize ret to nbytes to avoid returning garbage value
- From: Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/crypto: initialize ret to zero to avoid returning garbage value
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/crypto: initialize ret to zero to avoid returning garbage value
- From: Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: Fix for 4.8 (via kvm/master)
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: Fix for 4.8 (via kvm/master)
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 1/1] KVM: s390: vsie: fix riccbd
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/cpum_cf: Use kmalloc_array() in merge_attr()
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: s390/debug: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/17] s390/debug: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/extmem: Use kmalloc_array() in dcss_set_subcodes()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/cpum_cf: Use kmalloc_array() in merge_attr()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/17] s390/debug: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/17] s390/debug: Return directly if a null pointer was passed to debug_unregister()
- From: walter harms <wharms@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/17] s390/debug: Improve a size determination in debug_raw_header_fn()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/17] s390/debug: Improve another size determination in debug_info_alloc()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 16/17] s390/debug: Improve determination of sizes in debug_info_alloc()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/17] s390/debug: Improve a size determination in debug_sprintf_format_fn()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/17] s390/debug: Improve a size determination in debug_open()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/17] s390/debug: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/17] s390/debug: Fix indentation in 13 functions
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/17] s390/debug: Rename jump labels in debug_info_copy()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/17] s390/debug: Delete an unnecessary initialisation in debug_prolog_level_fn()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/17] s390/debug: Return directly if a null pointer was passed to debug_unregister()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/17] s390/debug: Fix a jump target in debug_register_mode()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/17] s390/debug: Add some spaces for better code readability
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/17] s390/debug: Rename jump labels in debug_open()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/17] s390/debug: Fix jump targets in debug_info_alloc()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/17] s390/debug: Rename jump labels in debug_areas_alloc()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/17] s390/debug: Delete unnecessary braces
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/17] s390/debug: Use kmalloc_array() in debug_areas_alloc()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/17] s390/debug: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] uprobes: remove function declarations from arch/{mips,s390}
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390: Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trivial treewide: Convert dev_set_uevent_suppress argument to bool
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trivial treewide: Convert dev_set_uevent_suppress argument to bool
- From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trivial treewide: Convert dev_set_uevent_suppress argument to bool
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trivial treewide: Convert dev_set_uevent_suppress argument to bool
- From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] uprobes: remove function declarations from arch/{mips,s390}
- From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trivial treewide: Convert dev_set_uevent_suppress argument to bool
- From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trivial treewide: Convert dev_set_uevent_suppress argument to bool
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] trivial treewide: Convert dev_set_uevent_suppress argument to bool
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/hypfs: Use kmalloc_array() in diag0c_store()
- From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/hypfs: Use kmalloc_array() in diag0c_store()
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/hypfs: Use kmalloc_array() in diag0c_store()
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/hypfs: Use kmalloc_array() in diag0c_store()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390: Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390: Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue
- From: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: Fix for 4.8 (via kvm/master)
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 1/1] KVM: s390: don't use current->thread.fpu.* when accessing registers
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: Fix for 4.8 (via kvm/master)
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae
- From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae
- From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: KVM: s390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: s390: Fine-tuning for kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: s390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: s390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 10/10] locking/rwsem: Add a boot parameter to reader spinning threshold
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: s390: Fine-tuning for kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM-S390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing specific kmalloc() calls by kmalloc_array()?
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replacing specific kmalloc() calls by kmalloc_array()?
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] treewide: replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() (2nd round)
- From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 10/10] locking/rwsem: Add a boot parameter to reader spinning threshold
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] treewide: replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() (2nd round)
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] treewide: replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() (2nd round)
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM-S390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM-S390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation
- From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM-S390: Delete an unnecessary initialisation for a buffer variable
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM-S390: Delete an unnecessary initialisation for a buffer variable
- From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/tape: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 07/10] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation
- From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/tape: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 07/10] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 10/10] locking/rwsem: Add a boot parameter to reader spinning threshold
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 08/10] locking/rwsem: Enable spinning readers
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 07/10] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation
- From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 09/10] locking/rwsem: Enable reactivation of reader spinning
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 07/10] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 06/10] locking/rwsem: Move common rwsem macros to asm-generic/rwsem_types.h
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 00/10] locking/rwsem: Enable reader optimistic spinning
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 04/10] locking/rwsem: Enable count-based spinning on reader
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 05/10] locking/rwsem: move down rwsem_down_read_failed function
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH-tip v4 03/10] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return a tri-state value
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: walter harms <wharms@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: walter harms <wharms@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] KVM-S390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] KVM-S390: Improve determination of sizes in kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] KVM-S390: Less function calls in kvm_s390_import_bp_data() after error detection
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] KVM-S390: Delete an unnecessary initialisation for a buffer variable
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] KVM-S390: Fine-tuning for kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
- From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] s390 patches for 4.8-rc3
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] zfcp fixes
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 0/2] KVM: s390: Fixes for 4.8 (via kvm/master)
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 2/2] KVM: s390: reset KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD if mapping the prefix failed
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 1/2] KVM: s390: set the prefix initially properly
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 0/2] KVM: s390: Fixes for 4.8 (via kvm/master)
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/10] zfcp: trace full payload of all SAN records (req,resp,iels)
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] zfcp: fix payload trace length for SAN request&response
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/10] zfcp: fix D_ID field with actual value on tracing SAN responses
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/10] zfcp: restore tracing of handle for port and LUN with HBA records
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/10] zfcp: trace on request for open and close of WKA port
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/10] zfcp: restore: Dont use 0 to indicate invalid LUN in rec trace
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] zfcp: retain trace level for SCSI and HBA FSF response records
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/10] zfcp: close window with unblocked rport during rport gone
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] zfcp: fix ELS/GS request&response length for hardware data router
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/10] zfcp: fix fc_host port_type with NPIV
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 07/15] smc: remote memory buffers (RMBs) (fwd)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/10] zfcp: close window with unblocked rport during rport gone
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/10] zfcp: trace full payload of all SAN records (req,resp,iels)
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/10] zfcp fixes
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/10] zfcp: restore tracing of handle for port and LUN with HBA records
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/10] zfcp: fix payload trace length for SAN request&response
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/10] zfcp: fix fc_host port_type with NPIV
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [s390:features 15/18] arch/s390/mm/gmap.c:106:3: error: 'gmap_asce' undeclared
- From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/10] zfcp: fix ELS/GS request&response length for hardware data router
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/10] zfcp: trace on request for open and close of WKA port
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/10] zfcp: fix D_ID field with actual value on tracing SAN responses
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/10] zfcp: restore: Dont use 0 to indicate invalid LUN in rec trace
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/10] zfcp: retain trace level for SCSI and HBA FSF response records
- From: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 15/15] smc: proc-fs interface for smc connections
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 12/15] smc: send data (through RDMA)
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 11/15] smc: connection data control (CDC)
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] smc: fix semicolon.cocci warnings
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] smc: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 14/15] smc: socket closing and linkgroup cleanup
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 08/15] smc: work request (WR) base for use by LLC and CDC
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 07/15] smc: remote memory buffers (RMBs) (fwd)
- From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 03/15] smc: establish pnet table management
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 14/15] smc: socket closing and linkgroup cleanup
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 12/15] smc: send data (through RDMA)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 07/15] smc: remote memory buffers (RMBs)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 09/15] smc: initialize IB transport incl. PD, MR, QP, CQ, event, WR
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 00/15] net/smc: Shared Memory Communications - RDMA
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 10/15] smc: link layer control (LLC)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 11/15] smc: connection data control (CDC)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 08/15] smc: work request (WR) base for use by LLC and CDC
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 15/15] smc: proc-fs interface for smc connections
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 06/15] smc: connection and link group creation
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 04/15] smc: introduce SMC as an IB-client
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 02/15] smc: establish new socket family
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 05/15] smc: CLC handshake (incl. preparation steps)
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND net-next 01/15] net: introduce keepalive function in struct proto
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio/s390 patches for 4.8
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [bug report] [S390] dasd: Add support for raw ECKD access.
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [bug report] [S390] dasd: Add support for raw ECKD access.
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [bug report] [S390] z/VM unit record device driver
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0021/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0023/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0022/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0026/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0025/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] s390 patches for the 4.8 merge window #2
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0875/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0904/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0904/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0876/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0882/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0875/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0883/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0880/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0879/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0885/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0884/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0878/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0904/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0899/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0901/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0893/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0895/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0890/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0897/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
- From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Bugtraq]