Re: next: s390 crash due to 's390: move sys_call_table and last_break from thread_info to thread_struct'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/25/2016 01:05 AM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
Hi Guenter,

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:53:52 -0800
Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks for the report. Builds for Z900 and Z990 are borked. This hunk

@@ -287,7 +292,13 @@ ENTRY(system_call)
        mvc     __PT_INT_CODE(4,%r11),__LC_SVC_ILC
        stg     %r14,__PT_FLAGS(%r11)
 .Lsysc_do_svc:
-       lg      %r10,__TI_sysc_table(%r12)      # address of system call table
+       # load address of system call table
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MARCH_Z990_FEATURES
+       lg      %r10,__TASK_thread+__THREAD_sysc_table(%r12)
+#else
+       lghi    %r10,__TASK_thread
+       lg      %r10,__THREAD_sysc_table(%r10,%r12)
+#endif
        llgh    %r8,__PT_INT_CODE+2(%r11)
        slag    %r8,%r8,2                       # shift and test for svc 0
        jnz     .Lsysc_nr_ok

makes ill use of %r10 in the #else part. Should be fixed now and tomorrows -next
tree will have the fix. Thanks again.


This is still crashing in -next with exactly the same message.

Yes, it is (note to myself: don't do things in a hurry). The patch below
gets linux-next booting again for CONFIG_MARCH_Z900=y on my test system.
Sorry about the trouble.

No problem. Just trying to make sure it doesn't find its way into mainline.

--
From 2ec05f7c28963c12e9618e9f7f3b29edcec40482 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:53:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] s390: fix kernel oops for CONFIG_MARCH_Z900=y builds

The LAST_BREAK macro in entry.S uses a different instruction sequence
for CONFIG_MARCH_Z900 builds. The branch target offset to skip the
store of the last breaking event address needs to take the different
length of the code block into account.

Fixes: f8fc82b47149e344 ("s390: move sys_call_table and last_break from thread_info to thread_struct")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Guenter

---
 arch/s390/kernel/entry.S | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
index 1cc4578..e2e47f7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
@@ -123,10 +123,11 @@ _PIF_WORK	= (_PIF_PER_TRAP)

 	.macro	LAST_BREAK scratch
 	srag	\scratch,%r10,23
-	jz	.+10
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MARCH_Z990_FEATURES
+	jz	.+10
 	stg	%r10,__TASK_thread+__THREAD_last_break(%r12)
 #else
+	jz	.+14
 	lghi	\scratch,__TASK_thread
 	stg	%r10,__THREAD_last_break(\scratch,%r12)
 #endif


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux