On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 07:54:12PM +0800, Baole Ni wrote: > I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. > As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, > and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, > thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. > > Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/s390/block/dasd_devmap.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_devmap.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_devmap.c > index 3cdbce4..a70a159 100644 > --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_devmap.c > +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_devmap.c > @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static ssize_t dasd_ff_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > return count; > } > > -static DEVICE_ATTR(failfast, 0644, dasd_ff_show, dasd_ff_store); > +static DEVICE_ATTR(failfast, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, dasd_ff_show, dasd_ff_store); Please consider all patches NACK'ed that touch s390 code, for the same reasons that have been outlined by several other people. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
