On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Some architectures use a hardware defined struct at address zero. > Checking for a null pointer will result in many ubsan reports. > Let users disable the null sanitizer. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > lib/Kconfig.ubsan | 11 +++++++++++ > scripts/Makefile.ubsan | 5 ++++- > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan > index 39494af..851c3f2 100644 > --- a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan > @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ > config ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL > bool > > +config ARCH_WANTS_UBSAN_NO_NULL > + def_bool n > + > config UBSAN > bool "Undefined behaviour sanity checker" > help > @@ -34,3 +37,11 @@ config UBSAN_ALIGNMENT > This option enables detection of unaligned memory accesses. > Enabling this option on architectures that support unaligned > accesses may produce a lot of false positives. > + > +config UBSAN_NULL > + bool "Enable checking of null pointers" > + depends on UBSAN > + default y if UBSAN && !ARCH_WANTS_UBSAN_NO_NULL I removed the not needed UBSAN from the "default y" and applied both patches to the s390 tree. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
