On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:04:18 +0200 SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 13:54:32 +0200 > > Several update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (17): > Use kmalloc_array() in debug_areas_alloc() > Delete unnecessary braces > Add some spaces for better code readability > Rename jump labels in debug_areas_alloc() > Fix jump targets in debug_info_alloc() > Rename jump labels in debug_info_copy() > Rename jump labels in debug_open() > Fix a jump target in debug_register_mode() > Return directly if a null pointer was passed to debug_unregister() > Delete an unnecessary initialisation in debug_prolog_level_fn() > Fix indentation in 13 functions > Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation > Improve a size determination in debug_open() > Improve a size determination in debug_sprintf_format_fn() > Improve a size determination in debug_raw_header_fn() > Improve determination of sizes in debug_info_alloc() > Improve another size determination in debug_info_alloc() > > arch/s390/kernel/debug.c | 433 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > 1 file changed, 204 insertions(+), 229 deletions(-) While I agree that the old code in arch/s390/kernel/debug.c does not abide to the current coding style standards, I doubt there is much value in these patches. To be honest I got annoyed after the third patch and stopped reading after the forth. NAK. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
