Re: s390/debug: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> While I agree that the old code in arch/s390/kernel/debug.c does not abide to
> the current coding style standards, I doubt there is much value in these patches.

How do you value the recommended compliance with the current Linux coding style convention?

Will my contribution be useful for further considerations?


> To be honest I got annoyed after the third patch

Thanks for your response.


> and stopped reading after the forth.

Does anybody in your company care for further improvements also in this software module?

Are there still opportunities to continue development in more constructive ways here?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux