I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c b/drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c index 3c379da..fb69230 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c +++ b/drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ tape_medium_state_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char * } static -DEVICE_ATTR(medium_state, 0444, tape_medium_state_show, NULL); +DEVICE_ATTR(medium_state, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, tape_medium_state_show, NULL); static ssize_t tape_first_minor_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ tape_first_minor_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *b } static -DEVICE_ATTR(first_minor, 0444, tape_first_minor_show, NULL); +DEVICE_ATTR(first_minor, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, tape_first_minor_show, NULL); static ssize_t tape_state_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ tape_state_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) } static -DEVICE_ATTR(state, 0444, tape_state_show, NULL); +DEVICE_ATTR(state, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, tape_state_show, NULL); static ssize_t tape_operation_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ tape_operation_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf } static -DEVICE_ATTR(operation, 0444, tape_operation_show, NULL); +DEVICE_ATTR(operation, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, tape_operation_show, NULL); static ssize_t tape_blocksize_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ tape_blocksize_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf } static -DEVICE_ATTR(blocksize, 0444, tape_blocksize_show, NULL); +DEVICE_ATTR(blocksize, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, tape_blocksize_show, NULL); static struct attribute *tape_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_medium_state.attr, -- 2.9.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html