On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Waiman Long wrote:
Currently, when down_read() fails, the active read locking isn't undone until the rwsem_down_read_failed() function grabs the wait_lock. If the wait_lock is contended, it may takes a while to get the lock. During that period, writer lock stealing will be disabled because of the active read lock. This patch will release the active read lock ASAP so that writer lock stealing can happen sooner. The only downside is when the reader is the first one in the wait queue as it has to issue another atomic operation to update the count. On a 4-socket Haswell machine running on a 4.7-rc1 tip-based kernel, the fio test with multithreaded randrw and randwrite tests on the same file on a XFS partition on top of a NVDIMM with DAX were run, the aggregated bandwidths before and after the patch were as follows: Test BW before patch BW after patch % change ---- --------------- -------------- -------- randrw 1210 MB/s 1352 MB/s +12% randwrite 1622 MB/s 1710 MB/s +5.4%
Yeah, this is really a bad workload to make decisions on locking heuristics imo - if I'm thinking of the same workload. Mainly because concurrent buffered io to the same file isn't very realistic and you end up pathologically pounding on i_rwsem (which used to be until recently i_mutex until Al's parallel lookup/readdir). Obviously write lock stealing wins in this case. Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
