Linux Arch
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [PATCH v12 05/13] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 06/13] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 07/13] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 09/13] kernel, arm64: untag user pointers in prctl_set_mm*
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 10/13] tracing, arm64: untag user pointers in seq_print_user_ip
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 13/13] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 12/13] bpf, arm64: untag user pointers in stack_map_get_build_id_offset
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 11/13] uprobes, arm64: untag user pointers in find_active_uprobe
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 03/13] lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 08/13] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 04/13] mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 01/13] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 00/13] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 13/14] arm64: update Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 09/14] kernel, arm64: untag user pointers in prctl_set_mm*
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 09/14] kernel, arm64: untag user pointers in prctl_set_mm*
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: elf: Advertise relaxed ABI
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Relax Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: Define Documentation/arm64/elf_at_flags.txt
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/4] elf: Make AT_FLAGS arch configurable
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
- From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 13/14] arm64: update Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt
- From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 10/14] tracing, arm64: untag user pointers in seq_print_user_ip
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 09/14] kernel, arm64: untag user pointers in prctl_set_mm*
- From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 03/14] lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user
- From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] KVM: export <linux/kvm_para.h> and <asm/kvm_para.h> iif KVM is supported
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 13/13] syscall_get_arch: add "struct task_struct *" argument
- From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: force all architectures except um to include mandatory-y
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: warn redundant generic-y
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] csky/ftrace: Add dynamic function tracer (include graph tracer)
- Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Remove custom MIPS32 __kernel_fsid_t type
- From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 10/14] tracing, arm64: untag user pointers in seq_print_user_ip
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
- From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 00/14] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 04/14] mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 07/14] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 06/14] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 05/14] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 01/14] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 09/14] kernel, arm64: untag user pointers in prctl_set_mm*
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 11/14] uprobes, arm64: untag user pointers in find_active_uprobe
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 12/14] bpf, arm64: untag user pointers in stack_map_get_build_id_offset
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 13/14] arm64: update Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 14/14] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 10/14] tracing, arm64: untag user pointers in seq_print_user_ip
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 08/14] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 03/14] lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 02/14] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: export <linux/kvm_para.h> and <asm/kvm_para.h> iif KVM is supported
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] MIPS: Remove custom MIPS32 __kernel_fsid_t type
- From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 10/10] thermal: intel: intel_soc_dts_iosf: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 10/10] thermal: intel: intel_soc_dts_iosf: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 09/10] gpio: uniphier: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 10/10] thermal: intel: intel_soc_dts_iosf: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 09/10] gpio: uniphier: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 08/10] gpio: pcie-idio-24: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 07/10] gpio: pci-idio-16: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 06/10] gpio: ws16c48: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 05/10] gpio: gpio-mm: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 04/10] gpio: 104-idi-48: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 03/10] gpio: 104-dio-48e: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 02/10] lib/test_bitmap.c: Add for_each_set_clump8 test cases
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 01/10] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 00/10] Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] m68k/mm: Implement set_pte_at() as an inline function
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] gpio: uniphier: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] gpio: uniphier: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New syscalls (was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the y2038 tree (now block and tip trees))
- From: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New syscalls (was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the y2038 tree (now block and tip trees))
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] gpio: uniphier: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] gpio: uniphier: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] gpio: uniphier: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: mm: call ctor for stage2 pmd page
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 1/4] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New syscalls (was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the y2038 tree (now block and tip trees))
- From: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New syscalls (was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the y2038 tree (now block and tip trees))
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] vmlinux.lds.h: drop unused __vermagic
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] vmlinux.lds.h: drop unused __vermagic
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- New syscalls (was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the y2038 tree (now block and tip trees))
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] vmlinux.lds.h: drop unused __vermagic
- From: Mathias Krause <minipli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 2/5] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 2/5] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 2/5] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
- From: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 2/5] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] vdso fixups
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] x86: vdso: fix compat_vdso build
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] arm64: vdso: turn off profiling etc
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] vdso: arm: use __iter_div_u64_rem() for 64-bit division
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] vdso: ARM: fix building without ARM_ARCH_TIMER
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] vdso fixups
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] signal: fix building with clang
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND v5 5/5] binfmt_*: scope path resolution of interpreters
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND v5 4/5] namei: aggressively check for nd->root escape on ".." resolution
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND v5 3/5] namei: O_THISROOT: chroot-like path resolution
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND v5 2/5] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND v5 1/5] namei: split out nd->dfd handling to dirfd_path_init
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND v5 0/5] namei: vfs flags to restrict path resolution
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] ILP32 for ARM64
- From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 07/12] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [1/2] powerpc: remove nargs from __SYSCALL
- From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 9/9] gpio: uniphier: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 8/9] gpio: pcie-idio-24: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 7/9] gpio: pci-idio-16: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 6/9] gpio: ws16c48: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 5/9] gpio: gpio-mm: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 4/9] gpio: 104-idi-48: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 3/9] gpio: 104-dio-48e: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 2/9] lib/test_bitmap.c: Add for_each_set_clump8 test cases
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 1/9] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 0/9] Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
- From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/20] mmiowb: Hook up mmiowb helpers to spinlocks and generic I/O accessors
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/20] Remove Mysterious Macro Intended to Obscure Weird Behaviours (mmiowb())
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/20] powerpc/mmiowb: Hook up mmwiob() implementation to asm-generic code
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/20] mips/mmiowb: Add unconditional mmiowb() to arch_spin_unlock()
- From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 13/20] riscv/mmiowb: Hook up mmwiob() implementation to asm-generic code
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 07/12] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 07/12] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/20] Remove Mysterious Macro Intended to Obscure Weird Behaviours (mmiowb())
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/20] Remove Mysterious Macro Intended to Obscure Weird Behaviours (mmiowb())
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/20] arch: Use asm-generic header for asm/mmiowb.h
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/20] mmiowb: Hook up mmiowb helpers to spinlocks and generic I/O accessors
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/20] x86/io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/20] m68k/io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/20] ia64/mmiowb: Add unconditional mmiowb() to arch_spin_unlock()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/20] mips/mmiowb: Add unconditional mmiowb() to arch_spin_unlock()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/20] sh/mmiowb: Add unconditional mmiowb() to arch_spin_unlock()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/20] nds32/io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/20] powerpc/mmiowb: Hook up mmwiob() implementation to asm-generic code
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/20] riscv/mmiowb: Hook up mmwiob() implementation to asm-generic code
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 18/20] i40iw: Redefine i40iw_mmiowb() to do nothing
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/20] Documentation: Kill all references to mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/20] scsi/qla1280: Remove stale comment about mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 19/20] net/ethernet/silan/sc92031: Remove stale comment about mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 20/20] arch: Remove dummy mmiowb() definitions from arch code
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/20] drivers: Remove useless trailing comments from mmiowb() invocations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/20] arm64/io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/20] ARM/io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Ensure inX() is ordered wrt delay() routines
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] vdso: use fixed-size time types
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] vdso: use fixed-size time types
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] vdso: use fixed-size time types
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] vdso: add clock_gettime64
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 22/23] x86: Add support for generic vDSO
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 01/23] kernel: Standardize vdso_datapage
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 11/20] ia64: Add unconditional mmiowb() to arch_spin_unlock()
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Ensure inX() is ordered wrt delay() routines
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 04/12] mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 07/12] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 06/12] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 08/23] arm64: compat: Add KUSER_HELPERS config option
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sparc: Unify the system call scripts
- From: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sparc: Unify the system call scripts
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] y2038: additional syscall ABI cleanup
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] div64.h: Fix description of do_div parameter
- From: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] div64.h: Fix description of do_div parameter
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mmap.2: describe the 5level paging hack
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mmap.2: describe the 5level paging hack
- From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 11/28] x86/asm/head: annotate data appropriatelly
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] div64.h: Fix description of do_div parameter
- From: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 08/20] m68k: io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 07/28] x86/asm/crypto: annotate local functions
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 08/20] m68k: io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 01/23] kernel: Standardize vdso_datapage
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 22/23] x86: Add support for generic vDSO
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 04/12] mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 07/12] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 06/12] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/page.h: fix typo in #error text requiring a real asm/page.h
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 10/20] mips: Add unconditional mmiowb() to arch_spin_unlock()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 07/20] nds32: io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 06/20] x86: io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 05/20] arm64: io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 01/20] asm-generic/mmiowb: Add generic implementation of mmiowb() tracking
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 11/20] ia64: Add unconditional mmiowb() to arch_spin_unlock()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 09/20] sh: Add unconditional mmiowb() to arch_spin_unlock()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 03/20] mmiowb: Hook up mmiowb helpers to spinlocks and generic I/O accessors
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 17/20] scsi: qla1280: Remove stale comment about mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 18/20] i40iw: Redefine i40iw_mmiowb() to do nothing
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 19/20] net: silan: sc92031: Remove stale comment about mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 20/20] arch: Remove dummy mmiowb() definitions from arch code
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 15/20] drivers: Remove useless trailing comments from mmiowb() invocations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 14/20] Documentation: Kill all references to mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 13/20] riscv: mmiowb: Hook up mmwiob() implementation to asm-generic code
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 12/20] powerpc: mmiowb: Hook up mmwiob() implementation to asm-generic code
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 08/20] m68k: io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 04/20] ARM: io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 02/20] arch: Use asm-generic header for asm/mmiowb.h
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 00/20] Remove Mysterious Macro Intended to Obscure Weird Behaviours (mmiowb())
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: io: Hook up __io_par() for inX() ordering
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] riscv: io: Update __io_[p]ar() macros to take an argument
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] asm-generic/io: Pass result of I/O accessor to __io_[p]ar()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3] Ensure inX() is ordered wrt delay() routines
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 19/23] arm64: Enable compat vDSO support
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 19/23] arm64: Enable compat vDSO support
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/23] arm64: Refactor vDSO code
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 13/23] arm64: compat: Add vDSO
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 11/23] arm64: compat: Generate asm offsets for signals
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 08/23] arm64: compat: Add KUSER_HELPERS config option
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 08/23] arm64: compat: Add KUSER_HELPERS config option
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 04/23] arm64: Substitute gettimeofday with C implementation
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 01/23] kernel: Standardize vdso_datapage
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 01/12] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 02/12] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 03/12] lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 05/12] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 06/12] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 08/12] net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 10/12] tracing, arm64: untag user pointers in seq_print_user_ip
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 12/12] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 11/12] arm64: update Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 09/12] kernel, arm64: untag user pointers in prctl_set_mm*
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 07/12] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 04/12] mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 23/23] kselftest: Extend vDSO selftest
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 22/23] x86: Add support for generic vDSO
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 21/23] mips: Add support for generic vDSO
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 20/23] arm: Add support for generic vDSO
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 19/23] arm64: Enable compat vDSO support
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 18/23] arm64: Add vDSO compat support
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 17/23] arm64: compat: Get sigreturn trampolines from vDSO
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 16/23] arm64: elf: vDSO code page discovery
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 15/23] arm64: compat: vDSO setup for compat layer
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 14/23] arm64: Refactor vDSO code
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 13/23] arm64: compat: Add vDSO
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 12/23] lib: vdso: Add compat support
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 11/23] arm64: compat: Generate asm offsets for signals
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 10/23] arm64: compat: Expose signal related structures
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 09/23] arm64: compat: Add missing syscall numbers
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 08/23] arm64: compat: Add KUSER_HELPERS config option
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 07/23] arm64: compat: Refactor aarch32_alloc_vdso_pages()
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 06/23] arm64: compat: Split kuser32
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 05/23] arm64: compat: Alloc separate pages for vectors and sigpage
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 04/23] arm64: Substitute gettimeofday with C implementation
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 03/23] arm64: Build vDSO with -ffixed-x18
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 02/23] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 01/23] kernel: Standardize vdso_datapage
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 00/23] Unify vDSOs across more architectures
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] csky: Add perf callchin support
- From: Mao Han <han_mao@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] asm-generic/page.h: fix typo in #error text requiring a real asm/page.h
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the dump stack arch description
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/18] ia64/tlb: Conver to generic mmu_gather
- From: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 06/18] asm-generic/tlb: Conditionally provide tlb_migrate_finish()
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem-spinlock.c & use rwsem-xadd.c for all archs
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 06/18] asm-generic/tlb: Conditionally provide tlb_migrate_finish()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the dump stack arch description
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the dump stack arch description
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/memory-model: Fix comment in MP+poonceonces.litmus
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the dump stack arch description
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] tools/memory-model: Do not use "herd" to refer to "herd7"
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] tools/memory-model: Fix comment in MP+poonceonces.litmus
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] tools/memory-model: Trivialities
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: Make time32 syscall numbers optional
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: Make time32 syscall numbers optional
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic 3/6] drivers/uio/uio_aec.c:62:49: sparse: expected void [noderef] <asn:2> *addr
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 06/18] asm-generic/tlb: Conditionally provide tlb_migrate_finish()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/18] asm-generic/tlb: Introduce HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 14/18] s390/tlb: convert to generic mmu_gather
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 06/18] asm-generic/tlb: Conditionally provide tlb_migrate_finish()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/18] ia64/tlb: Conver to generic mmu_gather
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 05/18] asm-generic/tlb: Provide generic tlb_flush() based on flush_tlb_mm()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 11/18] um/tlb: Convert to generic mmu_gather
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 13/18] asm-generic/tlb: Introduce HAVE_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 08/18] arm/tlb: Convert to generic mmu_gather
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 04/18] asm-generic/tlb: Provide generic tlb_flush() based on flush_tlb_range()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 02/18] asm-generic/tlb: Provide HAVE_MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 10/18] sh/tlb: Convert SH to generic mmu_gather
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 17/18] asm-generic/tlb: Remove tlb_flush_mmu_free()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 09/18] ia64/tlb: Conver to generic mmu_gather
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 00/18] generic mmu_gather patches
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 01/18] asm-generic/tlb: Provide a comment
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 12/18] arch/tlb: Clean up simple architectures
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 16/18] asm-generic/tlb: Remove HAVE_GENERIC_MMU_GATHER
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 05/18] asm-generic/tlb: Provide generic tlb_flush() based on flush_tlb_mm()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 14/18] s390/tlb: convert to generic mmu_gather
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 15/18] asm-generic/tlb: Remove arch_tlb*_mmu()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 03/18] asm-generic/tlb: Provide generic VIPT cache flush
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 07/18] asm-generic/tlb: Invert HAVE_RCU_TABLE_INVALIDATE
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 06/18] asm-generic/tlb: Conditionally provide tlb_migrate_finish()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 18/18] asm-generic/tlb: Remove tlb_table_flush()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] 32-bit userspace ABI: introduce ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T config option
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] csky: Use latest system call ABI
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] 32-bit userspace ABI: introduce ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T config option
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] powerpc: iomap: add missing const to ioread addr argument
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] csky: Fixup vdsp&fpu issues in kernel
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] csky: Use latest system call ABI
- From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] csky: Use latest system call ABI
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [asm-generic:master 4/6] lib/iomap.c:198:48: warning: passing argument 1 of 'mmio_insb' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [asm-generic:master 4/6] lib/iomap.c:198:48: warning: passing argument 1 of 'mmio_insb' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/8] riscv: Use latest system call ABI
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/8] unicore32: Fix __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 definition
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/8] y2038: remove time32 ABI on rv32 and csky
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/8] checksyscalls: fix up mq_timedreceive and stat exceptions
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/8] 32-bit userspace ABI: introduce ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T config option
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/8] asm-generic: Drop getrlimit and setrlimit syscalls from default list
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/8] asm-generic: Make time32 syscall numbers optional
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/8] compat ABI: use non-compat openat and open_by_handle_at variants
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/8] csky: Use latest system call ABI
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] iomap: fix multiple consistency issues, interface cleanup
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/4] riscv: switch over to generic free_initmem()
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/4] init: free_initmem: poison freed init memory
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/4] init: provide a generic free_initmem implementation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/4] hexagon: switch over to generic free_initmem()
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [asm-generic:master 4/6] arch/powerpc/kernel/iomap.c:142:6: error: conflicting types for 'ioread8_rep'
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:master 4/6] lib/iomap.c:198:48: warning: passing argument 1 of 'mmio_insb' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:master 2/6] arch/x86/mm/mpx.c:57:26: error: 'MAP_PRIVATE' undeclared
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:master 4/6] arch/powerpc/kernel/iomap.c:142:6: error: conflicting types for 'ioread8_rep'
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [asm-generic:master 2/6] arch/x86//mm/mpx.c:57:26: error: 'MAP_PRIVATE' undeclared; did you mean 'DQF_PRIVATE'?
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [asm-generic:master 2/6] arch/x86//mm/mpx.c:57:26: error: 'MAP_PRIVATE' undeclared; did you mean 'DQF_PRIVATE'?
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [asm-generic:master 2/6] arch/x86//mm/mpx.c:57:26: error: 'MAP_PRIVATE' undeclared; did you mean 'DQF_PRIVATE'?
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:master 2/6] arch/x86//mm/mpx.c:57:26: error: 'MAP_PRIVATE' undeclared; did you mean 'DQF_PRIVATE'?
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/io: Pass result on inX() accessor to __io_par()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] generic asm: mman cleanup
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] iomap: fix multiple consistency issues, interface cleanup
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] riscv: switch over to generic free_initmem()
- From: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] riscv: switch over to generic free_initmem()
- From: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] iomap: add missing function args identifier names
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] lib/iomap: add missing const to mmio_ins* addr arg
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] io: change io*_rep definitions to take ulong count
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] iomap: add missing const to ioread*/iowrite addr arg
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] iomap: fix multiple consistency issues, interface cleanup
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL V3] csky fixes for v5.0-rc6
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: void __iomem *addr should be const
- From: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: void __iomem *addr should be const
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mmap.2: describe the 5level paging hack
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/10] irqchip/csky: Support csky,dh7k SOC intc driver
- From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
- From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] riscv: switch over to generic free_initmem()
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/11] kernel/locks: consolidate RWSEM_GENERIC_* options
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/11] kernel/locks: consolidate RWSEM_GENERIC_* options
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/8] initramfs: move the legacy keepinitrd parameter to core code
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] initramfs: proide a generic free_initrd_mem implementation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] hexagon: switch over to generic free_initmem()
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] init: free_initmem: poison freed init memory
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] riscv: switch over to generic free_initmem()
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] init: provide a generic free_initmem implementation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/11] kernel/locks: consolidate RWSEM_GENERIC_* options
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH-tip 00/22] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/10] irqchip/csky: Support csky,dh7k SOC intc driver
- From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] initramfs: free initrd memory if opening /initrd.image fails
- From: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH-tip 00/22] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem-spinlock.c & use rwsem-xadd.c for all archs
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem-spinlock.c & use rwsem-xadd.c for all archs
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/11] kernel/locks: consolidate RWSEM_GENERIC_* options
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs
- From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] initramfs: proide a generic free_initrd_mem implementation
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 3/3] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 1/3] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 2/3] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem-spinlock.c & use rwsem-xadd.c for all archs
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/io: Pass result on inX() accessor to __io_par()
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: initramfs tidyups
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] initramfs: proide a generic free_initrd_mem implementation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/io: Pass result on inX() accessor to __io_par()
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/2] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/2] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH-tip 00/22] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/28] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] initramfs: proide a generic free_initrd_mem implementation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] initramfs: proide a generic free_initrd_mem implementation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- RE: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/8] mm: unexport free_reserved_area
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/8] initramfs: cleanup initrd freeing
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/8] initramfs: poison freed initrd memory
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/8] initramfs: proide a generic free_initrd_mem implementation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/8] initramfs: move the legacy keepinitrd parameter to core code
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/8] initramfs: cleanup populate_rootfs
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/8] initramfs: factor out a helper to populate the initrd image
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- initramfs tidyups
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/8] initramfs: free initrd memory if opening /initrd.image fails
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/io: Pass result on inX() accessor to __io_par()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH memory-model 5/7] tools/memory-model: Update Documentation/explanation.txt to include SRCU support
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Avoid duplicating herdtools versions
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH memory-model 4/7] tools/memory-model: Update README for addition of SRCU
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH memory-model 1/7] tools/memory-model: Rename some RCU relations
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH memory-model 2/7] tools/memory-model: Refactor some RCU relations
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH memory-model 6/7] tools/memory-model: Dynamically check SRCU lock-to-unlock matching
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH memory-model 3/7] tools/memory-model: Add SRCU support
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v5.1
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: io: Hook up __io_par() for inX() ordering
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/28] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/28] kernel: Define gettimeofday vdso common code
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mmap.2: describe the 5level paging hack
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH-tip 00/22] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features
- From: Chen Rong <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
- [tip:core/rcu] include/asm-generic: Remove spin_is_locked() comment
- From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <tipbot@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL V3] csky fixes for v5.0-rc6
- [PATCH v5 5/5] binfmt_*: scope path resolution of interpreters
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 4/5] namei: aggressively check for nd->root escape on ".." resolution
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 3/5] namei: O_THISROOT: chroot-like path resolution
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 2/5] namei: O_BENEATH-style path resolution flags
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 1/5] namei: split out nd->dfd handling to dirfd_path_init
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 0/5] namei: vfs flags to restrict path resolution
- From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] csky fixes for v5.0-rc6
- From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Semantics of symbol address in perf report -v
- From: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] Expose O_PATHSTATIC to userspace
- From: "Demi M. Obenour" <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] Expose O_PATHSTATIC to userspace
- From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4
- From: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4
- From: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5 09/12] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW
- From: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] Expose O_PATHSTATIC to userspace
- From: demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [GIT PULL] csky fixes for v5.0-rc6
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4
- From: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/io: Pass result on inX() accessor to __io_par()
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs
- From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs
- From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: io: Hook up __io_par() for inX() ordering
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs
- From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mmap.2: describe the 5level paging hack
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL V2] csky fixes for v5.0-rc6
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] csky fixes for v5.0-rc6
- From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] csky fixes for v5.0-rc6
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/io: Pass result on inX() accessor to __io_par()
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] arm64: io: Hook up __io_par() for inX() ordering
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Ensure inX() is ordered wrt delay() routines
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC LKMM 5/7] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Enforce heavy ordering for port I/O accesses
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] arm64 relaxed ABI
- From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC LKMM 5/7] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Enforce heavy ordering for port I/O accesses
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mmap.2: describe the 5level paging hack
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the dump stack arch description
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC LKMM 5/7] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Enforce heavy ordering for port I/O accesses
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the dump stack arch description
- From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the dump stack arch description
- From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[IETF Annouce]
[Netdev]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]