On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:12:02PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 09:29:32PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > > Changes in v10: > > - Fix off-by-one error in bitmap initialization in the > > test_for_each_set_clump8 function > > - Fix typos in clump_exp array definition in test_bitmap.c ("0x28" > > should have been "0x38") > > - Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro in intel_soc_dts_iosf.c > > One more, can you look at gen_74x164_set_multiple() ? It seems a candidate as > well, if I'm not mistaken. We can utilize the for_each_set_clump8 macro in the gen_74x164_set_multiple function, but I skipped over it earlier since I noticed it used the BITS_PER_BYTE define rather than a hardcoded 8. If it always loops 8 bits at a time, then we can use the for_each_set_clump8 macro; otherwise we would need the more generic for_each_set_clump macro to handle the non-8-bit looping cases. Will BITS_PER_BYTE always be defined as 8 bits? William Breathitt Gray > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >