Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > - unsigned long, fd, off_t, off) > + unsigned long, fd, off_t, pgoff) > { > + unsigned long off = pgoff; > + Would loff_t be better? David
Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > - unsigned long, fd, off_t, off) > + unsigned long, fd, off_t, pgoff) > { > + unsigned long off = pgoff; > + Would loff_t be better? David