Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> Thinking about this more, we can shave off the first 4 chars and have it >> be: >> >> spec_mitigations= >> >> I think it is painfully clear which speculation mitigations we mean. And >> the other switches don't have "cpu_" prefixes too so... > > Sure, I'm ok with renaming it to that, if there are no objections. What about when we have a mitigation for a non-speculation related bug :) mitigations=xxx ? cheers
