On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:42:55PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > Another idea I had (but never got a chance to work on) was to extend the > > x86 unwind interface to all arches. So instead of the callbacks, each > > arch would implement something like this API: > I surely thought about that, but after staring at all incarnations of > arch/*/stacktrace.c I just gave up. > > Aside of that quite some archs already have callback based unwinders > because they use them for more than stacktracing and just have a single > implementation of that loop. > > I'm fine either way. We can start with x86 and then let archs convert over > their stuff, but I wouldn't hold my breath that this will be completed in > the forseeable future. I suggested the same to Thomas early on, and I even spend the time to convert some $random arch to the iterator interface, and while it is indeed entirely feasible, it is _far_ more work. The callback thing OTOH is flexible enough to do what we want to do now, and allows converting most archs to it without too much pain (as Thomas said, many archs are already in this form and only need minor API adjustments), which gets us in a far better place than we are now. And we can always go to iterators later on. But I think getting the generic unwinder improved across all archs is a really important first step here.
