Re: civil discussion on fedora lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 18.10.2014 um 23:07 schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:51:52 +0200
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They do not say something like:
   "Sorry , I did not understand, can you repeat ?"

the say "bitte?" like "please" in english (one single word) but for
sure not "I'm not sure I understand the point you are making.
Particularly, I don't see how __________ follows. Can you explain
that in more depth?" - nowehere, never in real life

I am sure you are smart enough to understand that Matthew was
suggesting a different approach and not necessarily the exact wording
to use. Yes they may say 'sorry?' in person when the exchange is
direct, immediate and the context makes it clear they are saying sorry
because they did not understand. Unfortunately that is never the case
via email. You need a couple more words if you want to be sure to
convey the right meaning as tone, facial expression, and other signals
our bodies transmit in a live conversation do not work via email.

one possible solution

the much easier one would be realize that email is just short, no face-to-face and in doubt not meant as attack and so no take every single word serious

you say "email needs more explanation"
i say "no, email needs just not take anything personal"

with my way communication is *much more* efficient

just don't seek an attack and you are done most of the time

And instead say:
  "You are a moron that doesn't know how to speak GTFO now!"

nobody said anything like that in the whole thread the OP referred to
and nobody neends to pack "WTF are you talking about" in a paragraph
with 50 lines to be as polite as possible

read the last interview of Linus and you maybe understand what i am
talking about - packing the relevant information in 100 lines of
pseudo-code to be polite, friendly and the best human in the world
don't help anybody

people not taking every single word personal in a technical dicussion
would help everyone because the noise/information ratio would be much
more appropriate

I am sure you do not like impoliteness more than anyone else, you just
fail to understand different people have different sensibilities and
not everybody likes harsh language.

frankly i have no problem with impoliteness

in doubt i *prefer* impoliteness instead burry facts in a lot of words

Politeness do not require vagueness or extensive explanations, you can
be polite and short at the same time.

in your native language maybe

However a little bit of politeness does wonders for *interpersonal*
communications, we are not insensible robots but humans.

that's the point

so take words as "from a human" and not feel attacked whereever you see a chnace to do so and anything could be fine

Linus has some very good qualities as an engineer, but I wouldn't take
a lesson in effective communication from him.

in context of technical discussions you should do so

a lot of stuff about politeness would not be needed and if he would be that wrong frankly this mailing-list and Fedora would not exist at all

People resolve to harsh words, expletives and confrontation when they
are *bad* at communications. You can dress it up and rationalize it as
being direct and effective, but that doesn't make it true

that may be true - *but* i prefer people with knowledge *but not* good at communications over the ones good at communications but missing knowledge and relevant content

if somebody seeks for "communications" and "politeness" maybe a technical forum is just the wrong place

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux