On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/17/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Rivers wrote: >> >> On 10/17/2014 10:05, drago01 wrote: >>> >>> Because it makes no sense and pushes it to the user. The os (i.e we) >>> should handle that. In that case we should do both 1) have lower >>> bandwith requirements (i.e use deltas) *and* 2) have fast installation >>> of updates. Those two goals are not mutually exclusive. Its just the >>> current implementation that is lacking. So instead of messing with >>> questions during the installation we should just fix that. >> >> >> If the proper configuration can be determined automagically, > > Well a package installer can't have the knowledge which would be required to > determine such a decision. > > E.g. though a user could be connected via a fast connection he may have a > limited download contingent or could be charged at a high rate per download > volume. > > I.e. I don't see a possibility but to leave the final decision to the user. Did you even read my mail? The point is there shouldn't be a choice to be made in the first place. Which makes "how to choose what" moot. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
