On 10/17/2014 05:07 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/17/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Rivers wrote:
On 10/17/2014 10:05, drago01 wrote:
Because it makes no sense and pushes it to the user. The os (i.e we)
should handle that. In that case we should do both 1) have lower
bandwith requirements (i.e use deltas) *and* 2) have fast installation
of updates. Those two goals are not mutually exclusive. Its just the
current implementation that is lacking. So instead of messing with
questions during the installation we should just fix that.
If the proper configuration can be determined automagically,
Well a package installer can't have the knowledge which would be required to
determine such a decision.
E.g. though a user could be connected via a fast connection he may have a
limited download contingent or could be charged at a high rate per download
volume.
I.e. I don't see a possibility but to leave the final decision to the user.
Did you even read my mail? The point is there shouldn't be a choice to
be made in the first place. Which makes "how to choose what" moot.
Did you read my mail? I say, "no choice" is inapplicable, non-useful,
naive non-sense.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
