Fedora Kernel Development
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- ✅ PASS: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc5.1.cki.fc33 (ark)
- From: CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Change Makefile target names to dist-
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of prarit <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark merge request 354
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- kernel-ark merge request 354
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RHEL-specific patches in Fedora (non ELN) (was: Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7)
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] configs: Disable Serial IR driver
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of prarit <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stepping down as Fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RHEL-specific patches in Fedora (non ELN) (was: Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7)
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stepping down as Fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RHEL-specific patches in Fedora (non ELN) (was: Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7)
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stepping down as Fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RHEL-specific patches in Fedora (non ELN) (was: Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7)
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc5.1.cki.fc33 (ark)
- From: CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RHEL-specific patches in Fedora (non ELN) (was: Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7)
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- ✅ PASS: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc5.1.cki.fc33 (ark)
- From: CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RHEL-specific patches in Fedora (non ELN) (was: Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7)
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.6.12-200.fc31 (fedora-31)
- From: CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stepping down as Fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Stepping down as Fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Introduce a Sphinx documentation project
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH 2/6] Break out the Patches into individual files for dist-git
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH 6/6] Add zero-commit to format-patch options
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH 5/6] Copy Makefile.rhelver as a source file rather than a patch
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH 4/6] Move the sed to clear the patch templating outside of conditionals
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH 3/6] Match template format in kernel.spec.template
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/6] Patch Breakout again.
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH 1/6] Break the Red Hat patch into individual commits
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Introduce a Sphinx documentation project
- From: "Herton R. Krzesinski" <herton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Introduce a Sphinx documentation project
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] Introduce a Sphinx documentation project
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] Fix branch creation for releases based on tags
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ✅ PASS: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc4.1.cki.fc31 (ark)
- From: CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.6.11-200.fc31 (fedora-31)
- From: CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc4.1.cki.fc31 (ark)
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc4.1.cki.fc31 (ark)
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] Sign off generated configuration patches
- From: GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] Build ARK against ELN
- From: "Herton R. Krzesinski" <herton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Use __make macro instead of make
- From: Brian Masney <bmasney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Brian Masney <bmasney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Fix "multiple %files for package kernel-tools"
- From: Brian Masney <bmasney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc4.1.cki.fc31 (ark)
- From: CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] Use __make macro instead of make
- From: Gitlab Bridge on behalf of tstellar <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] Build ARK against ELN
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] Build ARK against ELN
- From: Gitlab Bridge on behalf of dzickusrh <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook
- From: Gitlab Bridge on behalf of dzickusrh <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.7.0-0.rc4.1.cki.fc31 (ark)
- From: CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] Add git config hook
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] Add git config hook
- From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ✅ PASS: Test report for kernel 5.6.10-200.fc31 (fedora-31)
- From: CKI Project <cki-project@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] Add git config hook
- From: Gitlab Bridge on behalf of dzickusrh <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] Add git config hook
- From: Gitlab Bridge on behalf of dzickusrh <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Call For Test Days for Fedora 33!
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Build ARK against ELN
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Fix "multiple %files for package kernel-tools"
- From: "Herton R. Krzesinski" <herton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Build ARK against ELN
- From: "Herton R. Krzesinski" <herton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] Fix "multiple %files for package kernel-tools"
- From: Gitlab Bridge on behalf of psgreco <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] Build ARK against ELN
- From: Gitlab Bridge on behalf of dzickusrh <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Drop the requirement to have a remote called linus
- From: Brian Masney <bmasney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Drop the requirement to have a remote called linus
- From: "Herton R. Krzesinski" <herton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OS-BUILD PATCH] Drop the requirement to have a remote called linus
- From: Gitlab Bridge <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- RFC: Adding "Requires: alsa-sof-firmware" to F31 kernel-modules pkgs
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fix MST regressions picked up in the Fedora kernel
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] drm/dp_mst: Fix drm_dp_send_dpcd_write() return code
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/1] Fix MST regressions picked up in the Fedora kernel
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+
- From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue with booting on latest kernels (EFI_DISABLE_PCI_DMA related)
- From: Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+
- From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+
- From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+
- From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Fedora Test Week] Kernel 5.6 Test Week Results
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fedora kernel workflow feedback
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue with booting on latest kernels (EFI_DISABLE_PCI_DMA related)
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Issue with booting on latest kernels (EFI_DISABLE_PCI_DMA related)
- From: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Probable issue with i965 in pre-rc1 5.7 kernels
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Fedora Kernel 5.6 Test Week Changes
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Fedora Kernel 5.6 Test Week 2020-04-13 to 2020-04-20
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Probable issue with i965 in pre-rc1 5.7 kernels
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backport ExFAT to Fedora 5.6 kernels?
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Rebase
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backport ExFAT to Fedora 5.6 kernels?
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Rebase
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Rebase
- From: "M. F. Ghani" <mfghani0@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Corrupt RPM package in Fedora 31 compose: perf-debuginfo-5.5.9-200.fc31.x86_64
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Corrupt RPM package in Fedora 31 compose: perf-debuginfo-5.5.9-200.fc31.x86_64
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Rebase
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Fedora Rebase
- From: "M. F. Ghani" <mfghani0@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backport ExFAT to Fedora 5.6 kernels?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backport ExFAT to Fedora 5.6 kernels?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backport ExFAT to Fedora 5.6 kernels?
- From: Joel Wirāmu Pauling <jwp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backport ExFAT to Fedora 5.6 kernels?
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Backport ExFAT to Fedora 5.6 kernels?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Getting a null pointer dereference error at end of dnf update with kernel 5.6 in F31
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BBR not set on, in fc32 kernel confg
- From: Joel Wirāmu Pauling <jwp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nvidia kernel is tainted following updates
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nvidia kernel is tainted following updates
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BBR not set on, in fc32 kernel confg
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BBR not set on, in fc32 kernel confg
- From: Joel Wirāmu Pauling <jwp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BBR not set on, in fc32 kernel confg
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BBR not set on, in fc32 kernel confg
- From: Joel Wirāmu Pauling <jwp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Laura Abbott <laura@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Upcoming Fedora kernel workflow changes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] Backported eDP backlight fixes for i915 (README)
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/7] Backported eDP backlight fixes for i915 (README)
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED panel
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Auto detect DPCD backlight support by default
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Fix eDP DPCD aux max backlight calculations
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/7] drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Fix DPCD register order in intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight()
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Assume 100% brightness when not in DPCD control mode
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode for some Dell CML 2020 panels
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgroup support in f31
- From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgroup support in f31
- From: Adrian Reber <adrian@xxxxxxxx>
- cgroup support in f31
- From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: "Michael J. Baars" <mjbaars1977.fedora-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: "Michael J. Baars" <mjbaars1977.fedora-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel SOF firmware
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Intel SOF firmware
- From: Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- compiling and installing a custom kernel (5.5.7)
- From: "Michael J. Baars" <mjbaars1977.fedora-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nvidia kernel is tainted following updates
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nvidia kernel is tainted following updates
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- nvidia kernel is tainted following updates
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: Laura Abbott <laura@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Have the 5.6 kernels dropped support for user input of entropy to the kernel?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: 5.6-rc3: changed COPYING can lead to a file conflict
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 5.6-rc3: changed COPYING can lead to a file conflict
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backporting 5.6 vboxsf to Fedora 5.5 kernels ?
- From: Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backporting 5.6 vboxsf to Fedora 5.5 kernels ?
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backporting 5.6 vboxsf to Fedora 5.5 kernels ?
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Backporting 5.6 vboxsf to Fedora 5.5 kernels ?
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Testing AMD Sensors Fusion HUB
- From: "Luya Tshimbalanga" <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: clean up a few trivial editing mistakes
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disabling CONFIG_SFI option ?
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Disabling CONFIG_SFI option ?
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [kernel-tests] branch master updated: skip paxtest for now
- [Test Day] Fedora Kernel 5.5 Test Week is under way. Participate today!
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Testing AMD Sensors Fusion HUB
- From: "Luya Tshimbalanga" <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: About new 5.6 CONFIG_EFI_DISABLE_PCI_DMA option
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Testing AMD Sensors Fusion HUB
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- About new 5.6 CONFIG_EFI_DISABLE_PCI_DMA option
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Testing AMD Sensors Fusion HUB
- From: "Luya Tshimbalanga" <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Testing AMD Sensors Fusion HUB
- From: Luya Tshimbalanga <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Testing AMD Sensors Fusion HUB
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Testing AMD Sensors Fusion HUB
- From: "Luya Tshimbalanga" <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-5.5.0-1.fc32.x86_64 DOA?
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-5.5.0-1.fc32.x86_64 DOA?
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-5.5.0-1.fc32.x86_64 DOA?
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Testing AMD Sensors Fusion HUB
- From: "Luya Tshimbalanga" <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest kernel headers not available
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest kernel headers not available
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest kernel headers not available
- From: parspes <parspes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Request for CONFIG_CAN_UCAN in Fedora kernels
- From: Christoph Müllner <christophm30@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: clean up a few trivial editing mistakes
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest kernel headers not available
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest kernel headers not available
- From: parspes <parspes@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Add PCI device IDs to e1000e driver for Comet Lake support (rhbz 1794369)
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Latest kernel headers not available
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Latest kernel headers not available
- From: "Pat Parson" <parspes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enabling vboxsf in Fedora 5.4+ kernels
- From: Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enabling vboxsf in Fedora 5.4+ kernels
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enabling vboxsf in Fedora 5.4+ kernels
- From: Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel-5.5.0-1.fc32.x86_64 DOA?
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Test Days] Fedora Kernel 5.5 Test Week 2020-02-10 to 2020-02-17
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- kernel-5.5.0-1.fc32.x86_64 DOA?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.5-rc1
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: man kernel_lockdown.7
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stepping down as fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stepping down as fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stepping down as fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stepping down as fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- man kernel_lockdown.7
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- stepping down as fedora kernel maintainer
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] kernel.spec: Remove kernel-keys directory on rpm erase
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dnf update installing an older kernel?
- From: "YOUNG, MICHAEL A." <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [EXT] Re: dnf update installing an older kernel?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [EXT] Re: dnf update installing an older kernel?
- From: "Anderson, Charles R" <cra@xxxxxxx>
- Re: dnf update installing an older kernel?
- From: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- dnf update installing an older kernel?
- From: "Anderson, Charles R" <cra@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Specfile tweak/fix for the nopatches path in kernel.spec
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] configs: clean up a few trivial editing mistakes
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] configs: remove CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_USER_FRIENDLY_LONG_NAMES
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.5-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.5-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] configs: remove CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_USER_FRIENDLY_LONG_NAMES
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] configs: remove CONFIG_MTD_M25P80
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] configs: remove CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT_VDSO
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: socket path length
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- socket path length
- From: Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Specfile tweak/fix for the nopatches path in kernel.spec
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Specfile tweak/fix for the nopatches path in kernel.spec
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- NO_HZ_IDLE on x86_64?
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- CONFIG_SFI is still set in rawhide and stabilization kernels
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 5.4 regressions
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Kernel 5.4 rebase plans
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Test Day] Kernel 5.4 test week starts today!
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bringing back tools/perf into the kernel.spec file
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cleaning out some scripts from the kernel dist-git
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Upstream fix for Raven Ridge
- From: "Luya Tshimbalanga" <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Upstream fix for Raven Ridge
- From: "Luya Tshimbalanga" <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel using rpmbuild method fails with config conflicts between kernel-local and x86_64.config
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Upstream fix for Raven Ridge
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel using rpmbuild method fails with config conflicts between kernel-local and x86_64.config
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Even though I have nobuild set for architectures, rpmbuild is processing their configs. Is this correct?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: I see this statement a lot in the kernel spec file. What is its interpretation? %if 0%{?fedora}
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel using rpmbuild method fails with config conflicts between kernel-local and x86_64.config
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel using rpmbuild method fails with config conflicts between kernel-local and x86_64.config
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel using rpmbuild method fails with config conflicts between kernel-local and x86_64.config
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Even though I have nobuild set for architectures, rpmbuild is processing their configs. Is this correct?
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building custom kernel using rpmbuild method fails with config conflicts between kernel-local and x86_64.config
- From: Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: I see this statement a lot in the kernel spec file. What is its interpretation? %if 0%{?fedora}
- From: Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Even though I have nobuild set for architectures, rpmbuild is processing their configs. Is this correct?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- I see this statement a lot in the kernel spec file. What is its interpretation? %if 0%{?fedora}
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Building custom kernel using rpmbuild method fails with config conflicts between kernel-local and x86_64.config
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Upstream fix for Raven Ridge
- From: Luya Tshimbalanga <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cleaning out some scripts from the kernel dist-git
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- cleaning out some scripts from the kernel dist-git
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Updated kernel to 5.3.11, now /dev/null does not return any data
- From: Lonni J Friedman <netllama@xxxxxxxxx>
- Updated kernel to 5.3.11, now /dev/null does not return any data
- From: Juha Nikkanen <nikkej@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enabling vboxsf in Fedora 5.4+ kernels
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enabling vboxsf in Fedora 5.4+ kernels
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enabling vboxsf in Fedora 5.4+ kernels
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enabling vboxsf in Fedora 5.4+ kernels
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Enabling vboxsf in Fedora 5.4+ kernels
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Some more upcoming Fedora kernel changes
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Some more upcoming Fedora kernel changes
- From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Some more upcoming Fedora kernel changes
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Some more upcoming Fedora kernel changes
- From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>
- bringing back tools/perf into the kernel.spec file
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Some more upcoming Fedora kernel changes
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Enable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF option
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Enable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF option
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New subpackages for Fedora
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New subpackages for Fedora
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- New subpackages for Fedora
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Jeremy Linton <jlinton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Erase i686 from the kernel package's repository?
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Talk from Flock up and a note on some upcoming work
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Erase i686 from the kernel package's repository?
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Erase i686 from the kernel package's repository?
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to properly PATCH F30 kernel to resolve GPU PASSTHROUGH Header Error Code 127
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to properly PATCH F30 kernel to resolve GPU PASSTHROUGH Header Error Code 127
- From: "Kot Begemot" <kbdeamon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to properly PATCH F30 kernel to resolve GPU PASSTHROUGH Header Error Code 127
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to properly PATCH F30 kernel to resolve GPU PASSTHROUGH Header Error Code 127
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to properly PATCH F30 kernel to resolve GPU PASSTHROUGH Header Error Code 127
- From: "Kot Begemot" <kbdeamon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to properly PATCH F30 kernel to resolve GPU PASSTHROUGH Header Error Code 127
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- How to properly PATCH F30 kernel to resolve GPU PASSTHROUGH Header Error Code 127
- From: "Kot Begemot" <kbdeamon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: fix typo "CONFIG_DRM_TDFX=n"
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] configs: fix typo "CONFIG_DRM_TDFX=n"
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.4-rc1
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.4-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.4-rc1
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.4-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] re-enable HDA sound drivers on PPC
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.4-rc1
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Enable CONFIG_EFI_TEST as a module (rhbz 1759325)
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Enable CONFIG_EFI_TEST as a module (rhbz 1759325)
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.4-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.4-rc1
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Enable CONFIG_EFI_TEST as a module (rhbz 1759325)
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Enable CONFIG_EFI_TEST as a module (rhbz 1759325)
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] Remove all Kconfig symbols dropped in v5.4-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] configs: remove CONFIG_CRASH
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] configs: remove CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_VTA
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] configs: remove two Kconfig symbols
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] Remove two Kconfig symbols dropped before v5.3
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] Kconfig symbol cleanup for v5.4-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] re-enable HDA sound drivers on PPC
- From: Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] re-enable HDA sound drivers on PPC
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] re-enable HDA sound drivers on PPC
- From: Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] re-enable HDA sound drivers on PPC
- From: Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Kernel 5.3 rebase plans
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Kernel 5.3 rebase plans
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Kernel 5.3 rebase plans
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Kernel 5.3 rebase plans
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Benjamin Kircher <bkircher@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Support buildid in kernel-headers
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fedora Linux Kernel Development.
- From: Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Support buildid in kernel-headers
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fedora 31 Kernel 5.3 Test Week 2019-09-30 to 2019-10-07
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Support buildid in kernel-headers
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Support buildid in kernel-headers
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- packet writing support
- From: Mischa Baars <mjbaars1977.kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- kernel testing important questions
- From: "Mgr. Janusz Chmiel" <janusz.chmiel@xxxxxxxx>
- [Test Day] Kernel 5.2 Test Week Report
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Kernel 5.3 rebase plans
- From: Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Kernel 5.3 rebase plans
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Kernel 5.3 rebase plans
- From: Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Clean up some old patches post F31
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Kernel 5.3 rebase plans
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Btrfs: fix unwritten extent buffers and hangs
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Btrfs: fix unwritten extent buffers and hangs
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Btrfs: fix unwritten extent buffers and hangs
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel 5.3.0-0.rc7.git1.1 src.rpm fails at the patching stage, on the first patch.
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel 5.3.0-0.rc7.git1.1 src.rpm fails at the patching stage, on the first patch.
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: custom kernel build with patch
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel 5.3.0-0.rc7.git1.1 src.rpm fails at the patching stage, on the first patch.
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel 5.3.0-0.rc7.git1.1 src.rpm fails at the patching stage, on the first patch.
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: custom kernel build with patch
- From: Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: custom kernel build with patch
- From: Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx>
- kernel 5.3.0-0.rc7.git1.1 src.rpm fails at the patching stage, on the first patch.
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: custom kernel build with patch
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: custom kernel build with patch
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- custom kernel build with patch
- From: Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] enable driver for accessing HMC CD/DVD drive
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] enable driver for accessing HMC CD/DVD drive
- From: Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Simple Firmware Interface being deprecated
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Simple Firmware Interface being deprecated
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Simple Firmware Interface being deprecated
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Simple Firmware Interface being deprecated
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Support buildid in kernel-headers
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Support buildid in kernel-headers
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Support buildid in kernel-headers
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: test patch for zswap bug
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: test patch for zswap bug
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: test patch for zswap bug
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- test patch for zswap bug
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/nouveau: Only recalculate PBN/VCPI on mode/connector changes
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: Only release VCPI slots on mode changes
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] drm/nouveau: Only recalculate PBN/VCPI on mode/connector changes
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: Only release VCPI slots on mode changes
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Backported fixes for MST regressions in nouveau
- From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] Remove some old modalias adjustments
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] Remove crash driver
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] Remove some old modalias adjustments
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] Remove crash driver
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Clean up some old patches post F31
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 9/9] Remove crash driver
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/9] Remove patch for GCC VTA
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/9] Remove old keyboard logging patch
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] Remove some old modalias adjustments
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/9] Drop old lis3 patch
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/9] Remove ancient ath9k workaround
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/9] Drop scsi warning patch
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/9] Drop cpumask auto select patch
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/9] Drop namespaces config tweak
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/9] Clean up some old patches post F31
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ALSA hda realtek: Add quirk for HP Envy x360
- From: "Luya Tshimbalanga" <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove all Kconfig symbols dropped in v5.3-rc1
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove all Kconfig symbols dropped in v5.3-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Bad RIP value?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Certificate used to sign Fedora kernels for UEFI Secure Boot?
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ppc: enable 8250 serial ports
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ppc: enable 8250 serial ports
- From: Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] enable NVRAM driver on ppc
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] enable NVRAM driver on ppc
- From: Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove all Kconfig symbols dropped in v5.3-rc1
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove all Kconfig symbols dropped in v5.3-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Remove all Kconfig symbols dropped in v5.3-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [fedora-arm] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [fedora-arm] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Test Kernel 5.2 this week!
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [fedora-arm] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 5.3.0-rc kernel-headers in rawhide and mass rebuild
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 5.3.0-rc kernel-headers in rawhide and mass rebuild
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- quick update on the BFQ I/O scheduler
- From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Serious problem (data corruption) with EVO860 disks + AMD SATA controllers
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ASIX_PHY
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ASIX_PHY
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable CONFIG_RC_XBOX_DVD ?
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable CONFIG_RC_XBOX_DVD ?
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable CONFIG_RC_XBOX_DVD ?
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Enable CONFIG_RC_XBOX_DVD ?
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: error while compiling Vmwareplayer kernel module
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- error while compiling Vmwareplayer kernel module
- From: "Mgr. Janusz Chmiel" <janusz.chmiel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: TCP Sack update?
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: TCP Sack update?
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: TCP Sack update?
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: TCP Sack update?
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: TCP Sack update?
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: TCP Sack update?
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- TCP Sack update?
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bluetooth regression breaking BT connection for all 2.0 and older devices in 5.0.15+, 5.1.x and master
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Patch "Revert "Bluetooth: Align minimum encryption key size for LE and BR/EDR connections"" has been added to the 5.1-stable tree
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bluetooth regression breaking BT connection for all 2.0 and older devices in 5.0.15+, 5.1.x and master
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Kernel 5.1 Test Day Report
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bluetooth regression breaking BT connection for all 2.0 and older devices in 5.0.15+, 5.1.x and master
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bluetooth regression breaking BT connection for all 2.0 and older devices in 5.0.15+, 5.1.x and master
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bluetooth 2.0 devices regression fix
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bluetooth 2.0 devices regression fix
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bluetooth 2.0 devices regression fix
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Bluetooth 2.0 devices regression fix
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove all Kconfig symbols dropped in v5.2-rc1
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ALLOW_LOCKDOWN_LIFT_BY_SYSRQ
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ALLOW_LOCKDOWN_LIFT_BY_SYSRQ
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ALLOW_LOCKDOWN_LIFT_BY_SYSRQ
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ALLOW_LOCKDOWN_LIFT_BY_SYSRQ
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Remove all Kconfig symbols dropped in v5.2-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ALLOW_LOCKDOWN_LIFT_BY_SYSRQ
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can Fedora enable CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK ?
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Can Fedora enable CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK ?
- From: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Test Days] This week test Kernel 5.1!
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] configs: remove CONFIG_ALLOW_LOCKDOWN_LIFT_BY_SYSRQ
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebase plans for kernel 5.1
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Rebase plans for kernel 5.1
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Correctly terminate the loop in configs/process_configs.sh
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] configs: correctly terminate loop
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Correctly terminate the loop in configs/process_configs.sh
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] configs: properly indent process_configs.sh
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: only visit generic/powerpc once
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] configs: only visit generic/powerpc once
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Call For Test Days for Fedora 31!
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- please remember to test F28 kernels
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] kernel-tools.spec: Adding libbpf package
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: configs: remove CONFIG_SUN50I_A64_UNSTABLE_TIMER
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: configs: remove CONFIG_SUN50I_A64_UNSTABLE_TIMER
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Remove all Kconfig symbols dropped in v5.1-rc1
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Remove three Kconfig symbols dropped before v5.0
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- configs: remove CONFIG_SUN50I_A64_UNSTABLE_TIMER
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix typo CROS_EC_DEBUGFS
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix filename typo CONFIG_STACKINIT
- From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] configs: only visit generic/powerpc once
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] configs: drop unneeded overrides
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] Fix typo CROS_EC_DEBUGFS
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix filename typo CONFIG_STACKINIT
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: "Christoph M." <christophm30@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove a patch that still touches userspace tools
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Drop six orphaned patches
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: "Christoph M." <christophm30@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: "Christoph M." <christophm30@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Request for CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV in Fedora kernels
- From: "Christoph M." <christophm30@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Remove a patch that still touches userspace tools
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Drop six orphaned patches
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Test Day] Kernel 5.0 2019-03-12
- From: Sumantro Mukherjee <sumukher@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?
- From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?
- From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebase plans for kernel 5.0
- From: Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?
- From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?
- From: stan <upaitag@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?
- From: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Rebase plans for kernel 5.0
- From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kernel bug triage cc list
- From: Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Older Fedora Users Mail]
[DVB]
[Samba]
[USB]
[Yosemite Questions]