On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:03:27PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > On 8/24/20 3:21 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:15:44PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:24:28PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>> > >>> But yeah, some will complain that now they need to copy a different > >>> file to import the .config, but at least they will be sure of what > >>> they are copying. > >> > >> Ah ok, so both rhel and fedora was built, one was tossed and the resulting > >> config files had the same name regardless which 'flavor' was choosen. That > >> is confusing. We can/should fix that to be more clear. Or I guess Prarit's > >> patch does just that. Thanks for pointing that out. > > > > It doesn't. Not yet, at least. :-) > > > > The behavior of dist-configs is the same before and after my patch. I haven't > done anything to change that behavior for fear of breaking something else. > > FWIW, I don't want to change the behavior in this patchset. It's just asking > for more trouble. Ok, I can agree with that, especially considering the changelog states: """ - Fix dist-configs to use a specified flavor instead of only ELN. By default, dist-configs will build ELN configs. """ Which is what it is doing right now, and leave the dist-config we discussed for a follow-up patch, as it is likely to be more polemic. Marcelo _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
