Live Patching
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [RFC][PATCH v2 08/11] context_tracking,rcu: Replace RCU dynticks counter with context_tracking
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH v2 07/11] context_tracking: Add an atomic sequence/state count
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH v2 09/11] context_tracking,livepatch: Dont disturb NOHZ_FULL
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH v2 11/11] context_tracking,x86: Fix text_poke_sync() vs NOHZ_FULL
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/11] sched,rcu,context_tracking,livepatch: Improve livepatch task transitions for idle and NOHZ_FULL
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/11] sched,livepatch: Use task_call_func()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] libkmod-module: add support for a patient module removal option
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: Joel Savitz <jsavitz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] livepatch,context_tracking: Avoid disturbing NOHZ_FULL tasks
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched,livepatch: Use task_try_func()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] livepatch,context_tracking: Avoid disturbing NOHZ_FULL tasks
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched,rcu,context_tracking,livepatch: Improve livepatch task transitions for idle and NOHZ_FULL cpus
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched,livepatch: Use task_try_func()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] livepatch,context_tracking: Avoid disturbing NOHZ_FULL tasks
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched,livepatch: Use wake_up_if_idle()
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched,livepatch: Use task_try_func()
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] libkmod-module: add support for a patient module removal option
- From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] libkmod: add a library notice log level print
- From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched,livepatch: Use wake_up_if_idle()
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched,livepatch: Use wake_up_if_idle()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched,rcu,context_tracking,livepatch: Improve livepatch task transitions for idle and NOHZ_FULL cpus
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched,rcu: Rework try_invoke_on_locked_down_task()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched,livepatch: Use task_try_func()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Simplify wake_up_*idle*()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 7/7] livepatch,context_tracking: Avoid disturbing NOHZ_FULL tasks
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Fix task_try_func()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Fix idle cpu's tasks transition
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] libkmod: add a library notice log level print
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Fix idle cpu's tasks transition
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] libkmod: add a library notice log level print
- From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] kmod: add patient module removal support
- From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Fix idle cpu's tasks transition
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] kmod: add patient module removal support
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] livepatch: Fix idle cpu's tasks transition
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Fix idle cpu's tasks transition
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 kspp-next 16/22] livepatch: only match unique symbols when using fgkaslr
- From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Fix idle cpu's tasks transition
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Fix idle cpu's tasks transition
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Kick idle cpu's tasks to perform transition
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 kspp-next 16/22] livepatch: only match unique symbols when using fgkaslr
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] livepatch: Fix idle cpu's tasks transition
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Kick idle cpu's tasks to perform transition
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.15
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.15
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: announcing LLpatch: arch-independent live-patch creation
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: announcing LLpatch: arch-independent live-patch creation
- From: Peter Swain <swine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: announcing LLpatch: arch-independent live-patch creation
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Kick idle cpu's tasks to perform transition
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: announcing LLpatch: arch-independent live-patch creation
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- announcing LLpatch: arch-independent live-patch creation
- From: Peter Swain <swine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx" <nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx" <nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 26/38] livepatch: Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions.
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tracing: define needed config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tracing: define needed config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v8 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v8 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v7 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v7 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v7 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v7 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v7 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v7 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v7 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v7 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v7 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v7 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH v2 3/3] libkmod-module: add support for a patient module removal option
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] libkmod/libkmod-module: add refcnt fd helper
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] libkmod: add a library notice log level print
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3] kmod: add patient module removal support
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tracing: define needed config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Kick idle cpu's tasks to perform transition
- From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] libkmod-module: add support for a patient module removal option
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] tracing: define needed config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
- From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reference to non-existing DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reference to non-existing DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
- From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] libkmod-module: add support for a patient module removal option
- From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] libkmod-module: add support for a patient module removal option
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 26/38] livepatch: Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions.
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] libkmod-module: add support for a patient module removal option
- From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/38] Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/38] Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 26/38] livepatch: Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug functions.
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/38] Replace deprecated CPU-hotplug
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Luis Chamberlain as modules maintainer
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/3] arm64: Improve the unwinder return value
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/3] arm64: Improve the unwinder return value
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v6 0/3] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Speed up transition retries
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Speed up transition retries
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Speed up transition retries
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Kick idle cpu's tasks to perform transition
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Speed up transition retries
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] livepatch: Kick idle cpu's tasks to perform transition
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v6 2/3] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v6 0/3] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v6 1/3] arm64: Improve the unwinder return value
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: implement live patching
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: implement live patching
- From: "nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx" <nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: "nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx" <nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/1] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, blacklist them in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, blacklist them in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, blacklist them in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, blacklist them in the unwinder
- From: "nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx" <nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, blacklist them in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: Handle funtion graph tracer better in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: Handle funtion graph tracer better in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: Handle funtion graph tracer better in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] arm64: Stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.13
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.13
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH v3 0/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: the qemu-nbd process automatically exit with the commit 43347d56c 'livepatch: send a fake signal to all blocking tasks'
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: the qemu-nbd process automatically exit with the commit 43347d56c 'livepatch: send a fake signal to all blocking tasks'
- From: xiaojun.zhao141@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: the qemu-nbd process automatically exit with the commit 43347d56c 'livepatch: send a fake signal to all blocking tasks'
- From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: the qemu-nbd process automatically exit with the commit 43347d56c 'livepatch: send a fake signal to all blocking tasks'
- From: xiaojun.zhao141@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: the qemu-nbd process automatically exit with the commit 43347d56c 'livepatch: send a fake signal to all blocking tasks'
- From: xiaojun.zhao141@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: the qemu-nbd process automatically exit with the commit 43347d56c 'livepatch: send a fake signal to all blocking tasks'
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: fix crashes due to use of cpu hotplug multistate
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: fix crashes due to use of cpu hotplug multistate
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: fix crashes due to use of cpu hotplug multistate
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: fix crashes due to use of cpu hotplug multistate
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: fix crashes due to use of cpu hotplug multistate
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Mark stack trace as unreliable if kretprobed functions are present
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: Mark a stack trace unreliable if an EL1 exception frame is detected
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] arm64: Mark stack trace as unreliable if kretprobed functions are present
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] arm64: Mark a stack trace unreliable if an EL1 exception frame is detected
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] arm64: Mark a stack trace unreliable if an EL1 exception frame is detected
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] arm64: Mark stack trace as unreliable if kretprobed functions are present
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Replace the fake signal sending with TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL infrastructure
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Replace the fake signal sending with TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL infrastructure
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] livepatch: Replace the fake signal sending with TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL infrastructure
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Replace the fake signal sending with TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL infrastructure
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Replace the fake signal sending with TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL infrastructure
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] livepatch: Replace the fake signal sending with TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL infrastructure
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: klp_send_signal should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: klp_send_signal should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD
- From: "dongkai (H)" <dongkai11@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: klp_send_signal should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: klp_send_signal should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: klp_send_signal should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
- From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: klp_send_signal should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: klp_send_signal should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
- From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
- From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] livepatch: klp_send_signal should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] livepatch: klp_send_signal should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD
- From: Dong Kai <dongkai11@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: Detect an EL1 exception frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: Detect an EL1 exception frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: Detect an EL1 exception frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: Detect an EL1 exception frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: Detect an EL1 exception frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at TASK_FRAME and EL0_FRAME
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: Detect an EL1 exception frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at TASK_FRAME and EL0_FRAME
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Live patching on ARM64
- From: "Singh, Balbir" <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at TASK_FRAME and EL0_FRAME
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at TASK_FRAME and EL0_FRAME
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: Implement arch_stack_walk_reliable()
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: Check the return PC of every stack frame
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] arm64: Detect kretprobed functions in stack trace
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Detect an FTRACE frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: Detect an EL1 exception frame and mark a stack trace unreliable
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at TASK_FRAME and EL0_FRAME
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] stacktrace: Move documentation for arch_stack_walk_reliable() to header
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] MIPS: livepatch: Add LIVEPATCH basic code
- From: Jinyang He <hejinyang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] MIPS: livepatch: Add LIVEPATCH basic code
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] stacktrace: Move documentation for arch_stack_walk_reliable() to header
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] stacktrace: Move documentation for arch_stack_walk_reliable() to header
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] stacktrace: Move documentation for arch_stack_walk_reliable() to header
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo and remove the unnecessary gaps in a sentence
- From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo and remove the unnecessary gaps in a sentence
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo and remove the unnecessary gaps in a sentence
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo and remove the unnecessary gaps in a sentence
- From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo and remove the unnecessary gaps in a sentence
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo and remove the unnecessary gaps in a sentence
- From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo in the file shadow-vars.rst
- From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo in the file shadow-vars.rst
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo in the file shadow-vars.rst
- From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC] MIPS: livepatch: Add LIVEPATCH basic code
- From: Jinyang He <hejinyang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf-probe: dso: Add symbols in .text.* subsections to text symbol map in kenrel modules
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf-probe: dso: Add symbols in .text.* subsections to text symbol map in kenrel modules
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] arm64: Unwinder enhancements for reliable stack trace
- From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] perf-probe: dso: Add symbols in .text.* subsections to text symbol map in kenrel modules
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] perf-probe: dso: Add symbols in .text.* subsections to text symbol map in kenrel modules
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf-probe: Failback to symbol-base probe for probes on module
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] perf-probe: Failback to symbol-base probe for probes on module
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.12
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.12
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 'perf probe' and symbols from .text.<something>
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: module loader dead code removal and cleanups v3
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/13] powerpc/powernv: remove get_cxl_module
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/13] drm: remove drm_fb_helper_modinit
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/13] drm: remove drm_fb_helper_modinit
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/13] module: pass struct find_symbol_args to find_symbol
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/13] module: pass struct find_symbol_args to find_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/13] kallsyms: refactor {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 12/17] gcc-plugins: objtool: Add plugin to detect switch table on arm64
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 12/17] gcc-plugins: objtool: Add plugin to detect switch table on arm64
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/13] module: remove each_symbol_in_section
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/13] module: merge each_symbol_section into find_symbol
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/13] module: pass struct find_symbol_args to find_symbol
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: module loader dead code removal and cleanups v3
- From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/13] module: pass struct find_symbol_args to find_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: module loader dead code removal and cleanups v3
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: module loader dead code removal and cleanups v3
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 13/13] module: remove EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL*
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/13] module: remove EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/13] module: move struct symsearch to module.c
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/13] module: mark module_mutex static
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/13] kallsyms: only build {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol when required
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/13] module: mark module_mutex static
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/13] module: remove each_symbol_in_section
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/13] module: remove EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/13] module: remove EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL*
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/13] module: move struct symsearch to module.c
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/13] module: merge each_symbol_section into find_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/13] module: pass struct find_symbol_args to find_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/13] kallsyms: only build {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol when required
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/13] kallsyms: refactor {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/13] module: unexport find_module and module_mutex
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- module loader dead code removal and cleanups v3
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/13] powerpc/powernv: remove get_cxl_module
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/13] drm: remove drm_fb_helper_modinit
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/13] kallsyms: refactor {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/13] kallsyms: refactor {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/13] kallsyms: refactor {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/13] kallsyms: refactor {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/13] kallsyms: refactor {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
- From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
- From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/13] module: mark module_mutex static
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/13] module: move struct symsearch to module.c
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/13] module: pass struct find_symbol_args to find_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/13] module: remove EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- module loader dead code removal and cleanups v2
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/13] module: unexport find_module and module_mutex
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/13] powerpc/powernv: remove get_cxl_module
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/13] livepatch: refactor klp_init_object
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/13] livepatch: refactor klp_init_object
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 13/13] module: remove EXPORY_UNUSED_SYMBOL*
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 13/13] module: remove EXPORY_UNUSED_SYMBOL*
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/13] livepatch: refactor klp_init_object
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] stacktrace: Move documentation for arch_stack_walk_reliable() to header
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] livepatch: move klp_find_object_module to module.c
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] stacktrace: Move documentation for arch_stack_walk_reliable() to header
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable stacktrace and minor cleanup
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Live patching on ARM64
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] livepatch: move klp_find_object_module to module.c
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable stacktrace and minor cleanup
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Function Granular KASLR
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Function Granular KASLR
- From: Fangrui Song <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable stacktrace and minor cleanup
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/13] livepatch: move klp_find_object_module to module.c
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- module loader dead code removal and cleanusp
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/13] powerpc/powernv: remove get_cxl_module
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/13] module: add a module_loaded helper
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/13] livepatch: move klp_find_object_module to module.c
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/13] kallsyms: refactor {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable stacktrace and minor cleanup
- From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 02/13] module: add a module_loaded helper
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/13] module: add a module_loaded helper
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/13] module: add a module_loaded helper
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/13] powerpc/powernv: remove get_cxl_module
- From: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/13] drm: remove drm_fb_helper_modinit
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/13] drm: remove drm_fb_helper_modinit
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/13] drm: remove drm_fb_helper_modinit
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/13] module: mark module_mutex static
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/13] drm: remove drm_fb_helper_modinit
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/13] kallsyms: only build {,module_}kallsyms_on_each_symbol when required
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/13] module: remove EXPORY_UNUSED_SYMBOL*
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/13] module: remove EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/13] module: merge each_symbol_section into find_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/13] module: pass struct find_symbol_args to find_symbol
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/13] module: remove each_symbol_in_section
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/13] livepatch: refactor klp_init_object
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: Live patching on ARM64
- From: Julien Thierry <jthierry@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable stacktrace and minor cleanup
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 1/2] Documentation: livepatch: Convert to automatically generated contents
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 2/2] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Live patching on ARM64
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Live patching on ARM64
- From: Julien Thierry <jthierry@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] stacktrace: Move documentation for arch_stack_walk_reliable() to header
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable stacktrace and minor cleanup
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 2/2] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 1/2] Documentation: livepatch: Convert to automatically generated contents
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable stacktrace and minor cleanup
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Live patching on ARM64
- From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Live patching on ARM64
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Live patching on ARM64
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Live patching on ARM64
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v7] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v7] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v7] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- [for-next][PATCH 3/4] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3 v7] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v6] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v6] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3 v6] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v5] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v5] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v5] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [for-next][PATCH 07/17] livepatch: Trigger WARNING if livepatch function fails due to recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [for-next][PATCH 11/17] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3 v5] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [for-next][PATCH 06/17] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3 v4] livepatch: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v3] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v3] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v3] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11 v3] livepatch: Trigger WARNING if livepatch function fails due to recursion
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/11 v3] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/11 v3] livepatch: Trigger WARNING if livepatch function fails due to recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/11 v3] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/11 v3] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2.2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2.2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2.2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/11 v2.2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/11 v2.1] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11 v2] livepatch: Trigger WARNING if livepatch function fails due to recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11 v2] livepatch: Trigger WARNING if livepatch function fails due to recursion
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/11 v2] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/11 v2] livepatch: Trigger WARNING if livepatch function fails due to recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/11 v2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3 v3] livepatching: Use the default ftrace_ops instead of REGS when ARGS is available
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] livepatch/ftrace: Add recursion protection to the ftrace callback
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.10
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: Implement reliable stack trace
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.10
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- livepatching.git#for-linus rebased
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: Do not check order when using "comm" for dmesg checking
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: Do not check order when using "comm" for dmesg checking
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: Do not check order when using "comm" for dmesg checking
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHSET RFC v3 0/6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] x86/unwind/orc: fix inactive tasks with stack pointer in %sp
- From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHSET RFC v3 0/6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHSET RFC v3 0/6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHSET RFC v3 0/6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHSET RFC v3 0/6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHSET RFC v3 0/6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHSET RFC v3 0/6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Patching kthread functions
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Patching kthread functions
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Patching kthread functions
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Patching kthread functions
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Patching kthread functions
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Patching kthread functions
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Patching kthread functions
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Patching kthread functions
- From: Nicolai Stange <nstange@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Patching kthread functions
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Patching kthread functions
- From: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Function Granular KASLR
- From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Function Granular KASLR
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Yosemite Forum]