Hi, > > Joe, what is the current state of klp-convert? Do we still want to follow > > that way? > > > > kpatch-build relies on klp-relocations and they work well enough across > the architectures we support. Its code is slightly different than > klp-convert, but concepts the same. Moving all of that into the kernel > build would definitely be better from a maintenance POV. Ok, then it makes sense to me to pursue this. > I can rebase the latest klp-convert patchset that I had worked on if we > want to test and review. Yes, please. I think we should take a fresher look and start working on it (again). > Apologies for losing momentum on that patchset > while waiting for .klp.arch stuff to drop out, in particular the subset > of static key relocations would still be supported. No need to apologize. Thank you for maintaining the patch set. Miroslav
