> On Dec 13, 2021, at 2:58 PM, David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon [2021-Dec-13 12:10:22 -0800]: >> The patch description needs a few tweaks. In the kernel we don't use >> Markdown for patch descriptions. >> >> A function can be postfixed with a trailing pair of parentheses, like >> klp_enable_patch(). >> >> Other symbols can be enclosed with single quotes, like 'struct >> klp_object'. >> >> I'd also recommend avoiding the excessive use of "we", in favor of more >> imperative-type language. >> >> See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more details. It's >> also a good idea to look at some kernel commit logs to get a general >> idea of the kernel patch description style. > > Understood, I'll take a read through and re-submit the patch to honor the > norms for Linux kernel patches. My sincere apologies for the noise, and > thank you for the positive and constructive suggestions. > >> I don't think the fix will be quite that simple. For example, if >> klp_init_patch_early() fails, that means try_module_get() hasn't been >> done, so klp_free_patch_finish() will wrongly do a module_put(). > > Ugh, good point and thank you for catching that. Another problem with the > current patch is that we'll call kobject_put() on the patch even if we > never call kobject_init on the patch due to patch->objs being NULL. > > Perhaps we should pull try_module_get() and the NULL check for patch->objs > out of klp_init_patch_early()? It feels a bit more intuitive to me if > klp_init_patch_early() were only be responsible for initializing kobjects > for the patch and its objects / funcs anyways. Pulling those logic out of klp_init_patch_early() makes sense to me. Alternatively, we may also have a cleanup section in klp_init_patch_early(), like below. I am not sure which way will be cleaner. Thanks, Song diff --git i/kernel/livepatch/core.c w/kernel/livepatch/core.c index 335d988bd811..20b959c82204 100644 --- i/kernel/livepatch/core.c +++ w/kernel/livepatch/core.c @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static void klp_init_object_early(struct klp_patch *patch, static int klp_init_patch_early(struct klp_patch *patch) { - struct klp_object *obj; + struct klp_object *obj, *obj2; struct klp_func *func; if (!patch->objs) @@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static int klp_init_patch_early(struct klp_patch *patch) klp_for_each_object_static(patch, obj) { if (!obj->funcs) - return -EINVAL; + goto cleanup; klp_init_object_early(patch, obj); @@ -890,9 +890,15 @@ static int klp_init_patch_early(struct klp_patch *patch) } if (!try_module_get(patch->mod)) - return -ENODEV; + goto cleanup; return 0; +cleanup: + klp_for_each_func_static(patch, obj2) { + if (obj2 == obj) + break; // done + /* do clean up */ + } } static int klp_init_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)