On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 01:37:21PM -0600, madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > unwind_start(&frame, fp, pc); > while (unwind_continue(tsk, &frame, fn, data)) > unwind_next(tsk, &frame); Other architectures seem to call their unwind_next() unwind_next_frame() instead, and use a function unwind_done() rather than unwind_continue(). I appreciate that's actually a change carried through from one of the earlier patches but might be worth considering. I don't really *mind* that, though if there's any work on pulling more code out of the architecture into the generic code it'll need revisiting in at least some of the architectures. Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
