On Thu, 23 Dec 2021, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > For now, that condition from remove_dot(): > > if (m && (s[n + m] == '.' || s[n + m] == 0)) > > which was designed to test if it's a dot or a \0 after the suffix > is never satisfied. > This is due to that s[n + m] always points to the last digit of a > numeric suffix, not on the symbol next to it: > > param_set_uint.0, s[n + m] is '0', s[n + m + 1] is '\0' > > So it's off by one and was like that since 2014. > > `-z uniq-symbol` linker flag which we are planning to use to `-z unique-symbol` Miroslav