Live Patching

• Thread Index

• [PATCH v15 5/6] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v15 4/6] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v15 3/6] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v15 2/6] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v15 0/6] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v15 1/6] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [RFC PATCH v15 0/6] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v15 4/6] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v15 5/6] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v15 2/6] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v15 6/6] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v15 3/6] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v15 0/6] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v15 1/6] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v14 0/7] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation
  • From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation
  • From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/livepatch: better synchronize test_klp_callbacks_busy
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] doc: module: update file references
  • From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] doc: module: update file references
  • From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v14 0/7] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] doc: module: update file references
  • From: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
  • From: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] doc: module: update file references
  • From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
  • From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
  • From: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
  • From: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
  • From: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] objtool: arm64: Implement command to invoke the decoder
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] entry/kvm: Exit to user mode when TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is set
  • From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] entry/kvm: Exit to user mode when TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is set
  • From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] selftests: livepatch: Test livepatching a heavily called syscall
  • From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
  • From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Move tests from lib/livepatch to selftests/livepatch
  • From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v14 0/7] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] selftests/livepatch: better synchronize test_klp_callbacks_busy
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.19
  • From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
• [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.19
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Remove klp_arch_set_pc() and asm/livepatch.h
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] objtool: arm64: Implement command to invoke the decoder
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v7 03/25] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] objtool: arm64: Implement command to invoke the decoder
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] objtool: arm64: Walk instructions and compute CFI for each instruction
  • From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC types
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] objtool: arm64: Walk instructions and compute CFI for each instruction
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] objtool: arm64: Implement command to invoke the decoder
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v7 03/25] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [GIT PULL] Modules fixes for v5.19-rc1
  • From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [GIT PULL] Modules fixes for v5.19-rc1
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [GIT PULL] Modules fixes for v5.19-rc1
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v7 03/25] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC types
  • From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation
  • From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] objtool: arm64: Implement command to invoke the decoder
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] objtool: arm64: Walk instructions and compute CFI for each instruction
  • From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] arm64: Build the kernel with ORC information
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] arm64: Enable livepatch for ARM64
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] arm64: unwinder: Add a reliability check in the unwinder based on ORC
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] arm64: Add kernel and module support for ORC
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] arm64: Add unwind hints to specific points in code
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] objtool: arm64: Generate ORC data from CFI for object files
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC types
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] objtool: arm64: Dump ORC data present in object files
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] objtool: arm64: Implement command to invoke the decoder
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] objtool: arm64: Walk instructions and compute CFI for each instruction
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC code
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] objtool: arm64: Add unwind hint support
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] objtool: arm64: Implement decoder for FP validation
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] objtool: arm64: Compute destinations for call and jump instructions
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC kernel code
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] objtool: Reorganize Unwind hint code
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] objtool: Reorganize instruction-related code
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] objtool: Move decode_instructions() to a separate file
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] objtool: Reorganize CFI code
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH v7 03/25] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: better synchronize test_klp_callbacks_busy
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Remove klp_arch_set_pc() and asm/livepatch.h
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Remove klp_arch_set_pc() and asm/livepatch.h
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v7 03/25] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v7 00/25] Rust support
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: better synchronize test_klp_callbacks_busy
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: better synchronize test_klp_callbacks_busy
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v14 1/7] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v14 2/7] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v14 2/7] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v14 1/7] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support
  • From: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
• [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support
  • From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support
  • From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxx>
• [RFC] sched,livepatch: call klp_try_switch_task in __cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support
  • From: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support
  • From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 03/23] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 3/3] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 0/3] kallsyms: Rust requirements
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Geert Stappers <stappers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 3/3] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v1 0/3] kallsyms: Rust requirements
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] entry/kvm: Exit to user mode when TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is set
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] entry/kvm: Exit to user mode when TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is set
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] entry/kvm: Exit to user mode when TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is set
  • From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] entry/kvm: Exit to user mode when TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is set
  • From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] entry/kvm: Make vCPU tasks exit to userspace when a livepatch is pending
  • From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v6 02/12] kbuild: Support for symbols.klp creation
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: elf API: was: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 03/12] livepatch: Add klp-convert tool
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v6 02/12] kbuild: Support for symbols.klp creation
  • From: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@xxxxxxxxx>
• elf API: was: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 03/12] livepatch: Add klp-convert tool
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v6 02/12] kbuild: Support for symbols.klp creation
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v6 01/12] livepatch: Create and include UAPI headers
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v14 0/7] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v14 6/7] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v14 7/7] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v14 3/7] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v14 2/7] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v14 1/7] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v14 0/7] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v14 4/7] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v14 5/7] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v1 1/9] objtool: Parse DWARF Call Frame Information in object files
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v1 8/9] dwarf: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v1 9/9] dwarf: Enable livepatch for ARM64
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v1 7/9] arm64: dwarf: Implement unwind hints
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v1 6/9] arm64: unwinder: Add a reliability check in the unwinder based on DWARF CFI
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v1 5/9] dwarf: Implement DWARF support for modules
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v1 4/9] dwarf: Implement DWARF rule processing in the kernel
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v1 2/9] objtool: Generate DWARF rules and place them in a special section
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [RFC PATCH v1 3/9] dwarf: Build the kernel with DWARF information
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Remove klp_arch_set_pc() and asm/livepatch.h
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Remove klp_arch_set_pc() and asm/livepatch.h
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.18
  • From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
• [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.18
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Remove klp_arch_set_pc() and asm/livepatch.h
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] livepatch: Remove klp_arch_set_pc() and asm/livepatch.h
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer
  • From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer
  • From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer
  • From: trix@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] livepatch: Reorder to use before freeing a pointer
  • From: trix@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 02/20] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 00/20] Rust support
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v3] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Only block the removal of KLP_UNPATCHED forced transition patch
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Only block the removal of KLP_UNPATCHED forced transition patch
  • From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [no subject]
  • From: Unknown
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Only block the removal of KLP_UNPATCHED forced transition patch
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] livepatch: Don't block removal of patches that are safe to unload
  • From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Only block the removal of KLP_UNPATCHED forced transition patch
  • From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Only block the removal of KLP_UNPATCHED forced transition patch
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Only block the removal of KLP_UNPATCHED forced transition patch
  • From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Only block the removal of KLP_UNPATCHED forced transition patch
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] livepatch: Only block the removal of KLP_UNPATCHED forced transition patch
  • From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] tracing: Fix selftest config check for function graph start up test
  • From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] tracing: Fix selftest config check for function graph start up test
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] tracing: Fix selftest config check for function graph start up test
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] tracing: Fix selftest config check for function graph start up test
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] tracing: Fix selftest config check for function graph start up test
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 05/11] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 02/20] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v4 02/20] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] module: Move latched RB-tree support to a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 12/13] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 05/13] module: Move latched RB-tree support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 03/13] module: Make internal.h and decompress.c more compliant
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 10/13] module: Move procfs support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 08/13] module: Move kmemleak support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 04/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 02/13] module: Simple refactor in preparation for split
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v6 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] kmod: add patient module removal support
  • From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] kmod: add patient module removal support
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [no subject]
  • From: Unknown
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v6 00/12] livepatch: klp-convert tool
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v6 11/12] livepatch/selftests: add data relocations test
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v6 10/12] livepatch/selftests: add __asm__ symbol renaming examples
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v6 03/12] livepatch: Add klp-convert tool
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v6 03/12] livepatch: Add klp-convert tool
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 12/12] livepatch/selftests: add static keys test
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 06/12] livepatch: Add sample livepatch module
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 08/12] livepatch/selftests: add klp-convert
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 11/12] livepatch/selftests: add data relocations test
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 09/12] livepatch/selftests: test multiple sections
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 10/12] livepatch/selftests: add __asm__ symbol renaming examples
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 04/12] livepatch: Add klp-convert annotation helpers
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 03/12] livepatch: Add klp-convert tool
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 07/12] documentation: Update on livepatch elf format
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 05/12] modpost: Integrate klp-convert
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 01/12] livepatch: Create and include UAPI headers
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 02/12] kbuild: Support for symbols.klp creation
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v6 00/12] livepatch: klp-convert tool
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v3] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Implement livepatch on PPC32 and more
  • From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 05/11] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 12/13] powerpc/ftrace: Prepare ftrace_64_mprofile.S for reuse by PPC32
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] powerpc/ftrace: directly call of function graph tracer by ftrace caller
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 12/13] powerpc/ftrace: Prepare ftrace_64_mprofile.S for reuse by PPC32
  • From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] powerpc/ftrace: directly call of function graph tracer by ftrace caller
  • From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] powerpc/ftrace: Prepare PPC64's ftrace_caller() for CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 10/15] FG-KASLR: use a scripted approach to handle .text.* sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 10/15] FG-KASLR: use a scripted approach to handle .text.* sections
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 05/15] x86: support asm function sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 10/15] FG-KASLR: use a scripted approach to handle .text.* sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 02/20] kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4 00/20] Rust support
  • From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 05/15] x86: support asm function sections
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 08/13] module: Move kmemleak support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v10 10/15] FG-KASLR: use a scripted approach to handle .text.* sections
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 05/13] module: Move latched RB-tree support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 02/13] module: Simple refactor in preparation for split
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 10/13] module: Move procfs support into a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 08/13] module: Move kmemleak support to a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 05/13] module: Move latched RB-tree support to a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 03/13] module: Make internal.h more compliant
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 02/13] module: Simple refactor in preparation for split
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
• [no subject]
  • From: Unknown
• [no subject]
  • From: Unknown
• [no subject]
  • From: Unknown
• [no subject]
  • From: Unknown
• [PATCH v10 13/15] module: use a scripted approach for FG-KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 08/15] x86/tools: Add relative relocs for randomized functions
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 11/15] x86/boot: allow FG-KASLR to be selected
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 02/15] livepatch: avoid position-based search if `-z unique-symbol` is available
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 04/15] arch: introduce asm function sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 03/15] kallsyms: randomize /proc/kallsyms output order
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 10/15] FG-KASLR: use a scripted approach to handle .text.* sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 06/15] x86: decouple ORC table sorting into a separate file
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 07/15] Makefile: add config options and build scripts for FG-KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 15/15] maintainers: add MAINTAINERS entry for FG-KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 09/15] x86: Add support for function granular KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 12/15] module: add arch-indep FG-KASLR for randomizing function layout
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 05/15] x86: support asm function sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 00/15] Function Granular KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v10 14/15] Documentation: add documentation for FG-KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 12/13] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 10/13] module: Move procfs support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 08/13] module: Move kmemleak support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 05/13] module: Move latched RB-tree support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 04/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 03/13] module: Make internal.h more compliant
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 02/13] module: Simple refactor in preparation for split
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v5 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] livepatch: Skip livepatch tests if ftrace cannot be configured
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 05/11] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Allen <allen.lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 08/13] module: Move kmemleak support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 10/13] module: Move procfs support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 12/13] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 04/13] module: Move latched RB-tree support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 05/13] module: Move arch strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 02/13] module: Simple refactor in preparation for split
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 12/13] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 10/13] module: Move procfs support into a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 08/13] module: Move kmemleak support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 06/13] module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 04/13] module: Move latched RB-tree support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] module: Move arch strict rwx support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 02/13] module: Simple refactor in preparation for split
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 01/13] module: Move all into module/
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] module: core code clean up
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
  • From: "nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx" <nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 05/15] x86: support ASM function sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
  • From: "nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx" <nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
  • From: "nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx" <nobuta.keiya@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 05/15] x86: support ASM function sections
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 04/15] arch: introduce ASM function sections
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 04/15] arch: introduce ASM function sections
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 04/15] arch: introduce ASM function sections
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v13 10/11] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 09/11] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 08/11] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 07/11] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 05/11] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 03/11] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 02/11] arm64: Rename unwinder functions
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 01/11] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v13 00/11] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.17
  • From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
• [GIT PULL] livepatching for 5.17
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 02/10] arm64: Rename unwinder functions
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame()
  • From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 07/10] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 07/10] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
  • From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 03/15] kallsyms: Hide layout
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 07/10] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available to nuke pos-based search
  • From: Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] powerpc/module_32: Fix livepatching for RO modules
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] livepatch: Fix build failure on 32 bits processors
  • From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] livepatch: Fix missing unlock on error in klp_enable_patch()
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 03/15] kallsyms: Hide layout
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v12 10/10] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 09/10] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 08/10] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 07/10] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 06/10] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 04/10] arm64: Split unwind_init()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 02/10] arm64: Rename unwinder functions
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame()
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [PATCH v12 00/10] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks
  • From: madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available to nuke pos-based search
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available to nuke pos-based search
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 03/15] kallsyms: Hide layout
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available to nuke pos-based search
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] livepatch: Fix missing unlock on error in klp_enable_patch()
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available to nuke pos-based search
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] livepatch: Fix missing unlock on error in klp_enable_patch()
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 03/15] kallsyms: Hide layout
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available to nuke pos-based search
  • From: Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available to nuke pos-based search
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] Function Granular KASLR
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] kernel: Add kallsyms_on_each_symbol variant for single module
  • From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] livepatch: Avoid CPU hogging with cond_resched
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] Function Granular KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] livepatch: Fix missing unlock on error in klp_enable_patch()
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] livepatch: Fix missing unlock on error in klp_enable_patch()
  • From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] Function Granular KASLR
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] Function Granular KASLR
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] Function Granular KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Fix kobject refcount bug on klp_init_patch_early failure path
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: Add livepatch API page
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Fix kobject refcount bug on klp_init_patch_early failure path
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 12/15] module: Reorder functions
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 15/15] maintainers: add MAINTAINERS entry for FG-KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 04/15] arch: introduce ASM function sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 14/15] Documentation: add documentation for FG-KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 13/15] module: use a scripted approach for FG-KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 03/15] kallsyms: Hide layout
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 11/15] x86/boot: allow FG-KASLR to be selected
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 10/15] FG-KASLR: use a scripted approach to handle .text.* sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 09/15] x86: Add support for function granular KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 07/15] Makefile: Add build and config option for CONFIG_FG_KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 08/15] x86/tools: Add relative relocs for randomized functions
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 06/15] x86: decouple ORC table sorting into a separate file
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 05/15] x86: support ASM function sections
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available to nuke pos-based search
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 01/15] modpost: fix removing numeric suffixes
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v9 00/15] Function Granular KASLR
  • From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] powerpc/ftrace: Add support for livepatch to PPC32
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] livepatch: Fix build failure on 32 bits processors
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Fix kobject refcount bug on klp_init_patch_early failure path
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: Add livepatch API page
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Fix kobject refcount bug on klp_init_patch_early failure path
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: Add livepatch API page
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v3] livepatch: Fix kobject refcount bug on klp_init_patch_early failure path
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: Add livepatch API page
  • From: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 13/13] powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace_32.S
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 12/13] powerpc/ftrace: Prepare ftrace_64_mprofile.S for reuse by PPC32
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 11/13] powerpc/ftrace: directly call of function graph tracer by ftrace caller
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 10/13] powerpc/ftrace: Refactor ftrace_{en/dis}able_ftrace_graph_caller
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 09/13] powerpc/ftrace: Implement CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 08/13] powerpc/ftrace: Prepare PPC64's ftrace_caller() for CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>