Linux Next
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
- From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ idr fixes from akpm-tree ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] staging/goldfish: Add MTD dependency to KCONFIG
- From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 [WARNING: at kernel/sched/clock.c:219 sched_clock_cpu+0xf9/0x110()]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] ipc: convert to idr_alloc()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (staging/goldfish)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (drivers/misc/mei)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] ipc: convert to idr_alloc()
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Heads up on a device tree change
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-02-06-17-13 uploaded (alsa)
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the s390 tree
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 7
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kvm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-02-06-17-13 uploaded (alsa)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-02-06-17-13 uploaded (iio)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the s390 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the s390 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-02-06-17-13 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Heads up on a device tree change
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Heads up on a device tree change
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Heads up on a device tree change
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the metag tree with the arc tree
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: EXPORT_SYMBOL(min_low_pfn);
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 [WARNING: at kernel/sched/clock.c:219 sched_clock_cpu+0xf9/0x110()]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 6
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the nfsd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the spi tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the iommu tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next tree
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the spi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-02-05-17-21 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: EXPORT_SYMBOL(min_low_pfn);
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the metag tree with the arc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] init: fix name of root device in /proc/mounts
- From: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] init: fix name of root device in /proc/mounts
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] init: fix name of root device in /proc/mounts
- From: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] init: fix name of root device in /proc/mounts
- From: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@xxxxxxxxx>
- [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- EXPORT_SYMBOL(min_low_pfn);
- From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 5
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 5
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix missing dependencies for NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLABEL
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] regmap: include linux/sched.h to fix build
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the battery tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix missing dependencies for NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLABEL
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] netfilter: fix missing dependencies for NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLABEL
- From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] regmap: include linux/sched.h to fix build
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (netfilter)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cortex tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the watchdog tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cortex tree with the arm tree
- From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the cortex tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stefan Roese <sr@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux-Next releases this week?
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Linux-Next releases this week?
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130128 lockdep whinge in sys_swapon()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: da9055_wdt needs to select WATCHDOG_CORE
- From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] staging: comedi: ISA DMA drivers should depend on ISA_DMA_API
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH -next] staging: comedi: ISA DMA drivers should depend on ISA_DMA_API
- From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: no tree for Jan 30
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pinctrl tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] staging: comedi: ISA DMA drivers should depend on ISA_DMA_API
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] watchdog: da9055_wdt needs to select WATCHDOG_CORE
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the tty tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 28
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the sound-asoc tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the tty tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Boot crashes due to global async pending list
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [next-20130124][next-20130125] Fix available for broken PM-suspend
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (kvm)
- From: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
- From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (kvm)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crash with 9fdb04c "async: replace list of active domains with global list of pending items"
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] extcon: max77693: Fix bug of build error related to INPUT subsystem
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (kvm)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 25
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Crash with 9fdb04c "async: replace list of active domains with global list of pending items"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] extcon: max77693: Fix bug of build error related to INPUT subsystem
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 24 (extcon-max77693)
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] serial: pch_uart: fix sysrq handling for pch_uart
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 24 (extcon-max77693)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
- From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 24
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] serial: pch_uart: fix sysrq handling for pch_uart
- From: Liang Li <liang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Liang Li <liang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Liang Li <liang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-01-23-17-04 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (hvc and virtio_console)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: "GMEINER.Christian" <C.GMEINER@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 23
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
- From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
- From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
- From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 22
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (ntb_hw.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (8250.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (gpio-palmas.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (x509)
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the drm tree
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/1] page_alloc: Bootmem limit with movablecore_map
- From: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the drm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the gpio-lw tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
- From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Ilya Zykov <ilya@xxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Ilya Zykov <ilya@xxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tty: Correct tty buffer flush.
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN tty-next on suspend ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-18-15-48 uploaded
- From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130118 1/2] KEYS: Fix build-error when SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING=n
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130118 1/2] KEYS: Fix build-error when SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING=n
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next-20130118 2/2] KEYS: MODSIGN: Fix wrong select in MODULE_SIG Kconfig
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next-20130118 1/2] KEYS: Fix build-error when SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING=n
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (x509)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-01-18-15-48 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (powerclamp)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: "Kondratiev, Vladimir" <vkondrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 18
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tty tree
- From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <siglesias@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 17
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tty tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [3.8-{rc1,rc2}] ata1.00: failed to get Identify Device Data, Emask 0x1
- From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [3.8-{rc1,rc2}] ata1.00: failed to get Identify Device Data, Emask 0x1
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Prisk <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Prisk <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 15
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 (trouble starting kvm)
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
- From: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
- From: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix BUG on madvise early failure
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix BUG on madvise early failure
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix BUG on madvise early failure
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
- From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the crypto tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (wireless/ath9k)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: -next: no resume from suspend
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 14
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the crypto tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: change contacts for the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 (trouble starting kvm)
- From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: wenxiong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] staging/sb105x: PARPORT config is not good enough must use PARPORT_PC
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for tree inclusion
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (staging/sb105x)
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 11 (pefile_parser)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 11 (vmci)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 11 (rcutree)
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ia64 tree
- From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 11 (rcutree)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: Brian King <brking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: Brian King <brking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 11
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
- From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the xilinx tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for tree inclusion
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ia64 tree
- From: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the ia64 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (staging/sb105x)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (staging/sb105x)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (vmci)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (vmci)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kvm tree
- From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: change contacts for the kvm tree
- From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 10
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: change contacts for the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the tree
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 9
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
- From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] xtensa: pull signal definitions from signal-defs.h
- From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drop-experimental tree with Linus' and the net-next trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drop-experimental tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-04-15-43 uploaded (aio)
- From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-04-15-43 uploaded (aio)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-01-04-15-43 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 4 (net/bridge)
- From: Rami Rosen <roszenrami@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 4 (net/bridge)
- From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 4 (net/bridge)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Add #includes needed to permit the removal of asm/system.h - sha1 96f951edb1f1bdbbc99b0cd458f9808bb83d58ae
- From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pekey tree
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pekey tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: bad merge in driver-core.current tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: bad merge in driver-core.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 3 (qlcnic)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 3 (qlcnic)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 2 (netfilter)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 3 (broadcom/bnx2x)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Add #includes needed to permit the removal of asm/system.h - sha1 96f951edb1f1bdbbc99b0cd458f9808bb83d58ae
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Add #includes needed to permit the removal of asm/system.h - sha1 96f951edb1f1bdbbc99b0cd458f9808bb83d58ae
- From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 3
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 2 (netfilter)
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 2 (netfilter)
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 2 (netfilter)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the driver-core.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the driver-core.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pinctrl tree
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 24
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the driver-core.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the driver-core.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3.8-rc1)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2012-12-20-16-15 uploaded
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pinctrl tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pinctrl tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2012-12-20-16-15 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
- From: Vipul Pandya <vipul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 20
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree and the cris tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
- From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] f2fs: add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
- From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] f2fs: add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (mm/compaction.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with Linus' tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the fsnotify tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ PATCH] Add rcu user eqs exception hooks for async page fault
- From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 18
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 3/9] i82975x_edac.c: cleanup debug code
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 8/9] i82975x_edac: fix wrong offset reported
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: -mm git tree for since-3.7 is open (was: mmotm 2012-12-14-17-51 uploaded)
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 3/9] i82975x_edac.c: cleanup debug code
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
- -mm git tree for since-3.7 is open (was: mmotm 2012-12-14-17-51 uploaded)
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 2/9] i82975x_edac.c: fix layers initialisation
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 17
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
- From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
- From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
- From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
- From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 5/9] i82975x_edac: optimise mode detection
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 1/9] i82975x_edac.c: fix style errors
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3.7.0 9/9] i82975x_edac: set sw-scrub mode, bump rev.
- From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Samba]
[Yosemite News]