RE: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I think I have this slightly different in wireless-testing.  Johannes, please
> review and advise...

> > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c between commit eabc4ac5d760
> > ("iwlwifi: pcie: disable L1 Active after pci_enable_device") from
> > thewireless tree and commit f2532b04b2ec ("iwlwifi: pcie: don't
> > disable
> > L1 for newest NICs") from the wireless-next tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (maybe - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> > (no action is required).


> > diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
> > index 390e2f0,e52d1ce..0000000
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
> > @@@ -1502,16 -1400,22 +1400,22 @@@ struct iwl_trans
> *iwl_trans_pcie_alloc(
> >   	spin_lock_init(&trans_pcie->reg_lock);
> >   	init_waitqueue_head(&trans_pcie->ucode_write_waitq);
> >
> >  +	if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
> >  +		err = -ENODEV;
> >  +		goto out_no_pci;
> >  +	}
> >  +
> > - 	/* W/A - seems to solve weird behavior. We need to remove this if
> we
> > - 	 * don't want to stay in L1 all the time. This wastes a lot of power */
> > - 	pci_disable_link_state(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S |
> PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 |
> > - 			       PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM);
> > + 	if (!cfg->base_params->pcie_l1_allowed) {
> > + 		/*
> > + 		 * W/A - seems to solve weird behavior. We need to remove
> this
> > + 		 * if we don't want to stay in L1 all the time. This wastes a
> > + 		 * lot of power.
> > + 		 */
> > + 		pci_disable_link_state(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S |
> > + 				       PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 |
> > + 				       PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM);
> > + 	}
> >
> >  -	if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
> >  -		err = -ENODEV;
> >  -		goto out_no_pci;
> >  -	}
> >  -
> >   	pci_set_master(pdev);
> >
> >   	err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(36));

This looks fine, and it seems to be exactly what you have in wireless-testing/master. I have yet another change pending to this which removes the err= in favour of taking it from pci_enable_device() though.

johannes
(sorry for the outlook mess - might want to use johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
-- 

Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux