On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> NO_IRQ is evil. Stop using it in arch/powerpc and powerpc device drivers
>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
>> index 3e06696..55c6ff9 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c
>> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static int __devinit fsl_ssi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> ssi_private->ssi_phys = res.start;
>>
>> ssi_private->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
>> - if (ssi_private->irq == NO_IRQ) {
>> + if (!ssi_private->irq) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no irq for node %s\n", np->full_name);
>> ret = -ENXIO;
>> goto error_iomap;
>
> What's the plan with this patch?
>
> This is now failing on xtensa, as it's one of the architectures that doesn't
> define NO_IRQ. Only arm, c6x, mn10300, openrisc, parisc, powerpc, and sparc
> define it.
Wow. I'd pretty much dropped that patch because I didn't have time to
chase it down. It should be pursued though.
In that particular case it is safe I think to apply the change. PPC
defines NO_IRQ to be 0 anyway.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
