On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:46:30 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Dwight Engen wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c index f390042..90fb308 > > 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c > > @@ -620,12 +620,12 @@ spufs_parse_options(struct super_block *sb, > > char *options, struct inode *root) case Opt_uid: > > if (match_int(&args[0], &option)) > > return 0; > > - root->i_uid = option; > > + root->i_uid = make_kuid(&init_user_ns, > > option); break; > > case Opt_gid: > > if (match_int(&args[0], &option)) > > return 0; > > - root->i_gid = option; > > + root->i_gid = make_kgid(&init_user_ns, > > option); break; > > case Opt_mode: > > if (match_octal(&args[0], &option)) > > Doesn't this mean the uid/gid is taken from the initial namespace > rather than from the namespace of the 'mount' process calling this? I > think the logical choice would be to have the UID be the one that > gets passed here in the caller's namespace. Yes, I agree. The other filesystems that take an Opt_uid as well do use current_user_ns() and not init_user_ns. They also do a uid_valid() check and fail the mount (or fallback to GLOBAL_ROOT_UID). So I think that would look like this: diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c index f390042..87ba7cf 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c @@ -620,12 +620,16 @@ spufs_parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options, struct inode *root) case Opt_uid: if (match_int(&args[0], &option)) return 0; - root->i_uid = option; + root->i_uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), option); + if (!uid_valid(root->i_uid)) + return 0; break; case Opt_gid: if (match_int(&args[0], &option)) return 0; - root->i_gid = option; + root->i_gid = make_kgid(current_user_ns(), option); + if (!gid_valid(root->i_gid)) + return 0; break; case Opt_mode: if (match_octal(&args[0], &option)) Again, I have not run tested this so we may just want to disable SPU_FS with USER_NS until they can be tested together. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html