On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I have compared next-20130725 VS. next-20130726: >>> >>> $ head -2313 next-20130725-VS-next-20130726.diff | grep ^+ | grep i915 >>> + drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file >>> + drm/i915: Use a private interface for register access within GT >>> + drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants >>> + drm/i915: Squash gen lookup through multiple indirections >>> inside GT access >>> + drm/i915: Convert the register access tracepoint to be conditional >>> + drm/i915: fix the racy object accounting >>> + drm/i915: dvo_ch7xxx: fix vsync polarity setting >>> + drm/i915: initialize gt_lock early with other spin locks >>> + Revert "ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware >>> expects Windows 8" >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 2 + >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ch7xxx.c | 2 +- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 836 +-- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 91 +- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 292 +- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 413 +- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 411 +- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 1347 ++--- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 16 +- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 1065 ++-- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 36 +- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 431 +- >>> + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 595 +++ >>> >>> Any hints which of the commits could be culprit? >> >> None, it's the vma offset manager stuff in drm-next. >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c >> index 3613b50..1f76572 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c >> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ int drm_gem_mmap(struct file *filp, struct >> vm_area_struct *vma) >> } >> >> obj = container_of(node, struct drm_gem_object, vma_node); >> - ret = drm_gem_mmap_obj(obj, drm_vma_node_size(node), vma); >> + ret = drm_gem_mmap_obj(obj, drm_vma_node_size(node) << PAGE_SHIFT, vma); >> >> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); >> >> >> That should fix stuff up again, David Herrmann is working on a real >> patch already. >> > > The fix can be found at [1]. > v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2833959/ - Sedat - > - Sedat - > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2833932/ > >> Cheers, Daniel >> -- >> Daniel Vetter >> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation >> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
