On 08/12/2013 09:19 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
On (08/12/13 08:55), Peter Hurley wrote:
[..]
drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
I hate to do this, but isn't it actually my patch posted here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/1/510
which was tagged as `wrong'?
Sergey,
My apologies; I was mistaken regarding this problem being a lockdep
regression (although it's still a false positive from lockdep). Once
I had worked around some issues with the nouveau driver, I was able to
reproduce the lockdep report on 3.10.
no problem.
I included Artem's lockdep report in the changelog because I received
that first, on 30 July.
My patch below is not the same as your patch of 1 Aug. This patch
preserves the protected access of termios.c_cc[VMIN] and termios.c_cc[VTIME]
(via the MIN_CHAR() and TIME_CHAR() macros).
fair enough. v3 was protecting VMIN/VTIME (my bad, I noticed this a bit later),
but I didn't submit it since v2 did not get positive response.
If you'd prefer, I could add to changelog:
Patch based on original posted here https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/1/510
by Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
if you don't mind, that would be great.
Ok.
Greg,
Should I re-spin a v2 to include the note above
(or can you add it with Artem's Tested-by)?
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
