On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 17:59 +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > The idea behind this patch is that users setting the protocol to > something else probably do know better and so should be left alone. Regardless of that, I think that still the skb pointers would be changed by this patch which would confuse the receiver of the SKB (device driver), no? Has anyone verified that theory? :) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html