On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 10:21:09 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I have compared both mm/memcontrol.c files from
>> next-20130703/next-20130704 - they are identical.
>>
>> These hunks...
>>
>> [ From Li Zefan ]
>> @@ -6332,8 +6341,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup *cont)
>> {
>> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>>
>> - mem_cgroup_sockets_destroy(memcg);
>> -
>> + memcg_destroy_kmem(memcg);
>> __mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
>> }
>>
>> [ From mmots ]
>> @@ -6399,8 +6408,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct c
>> {
>> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>>
>> - mem_cgroup_sockets_destroy(memcg);
>> -
>> + memcg_destroy_kmem(memcg);
>> mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
>> }
>>
>> ...seems to differ.
>>
>> In both mentioned -next releases there exist no mem_cgroup_put() in
>> mm/memcontrol.c.
>> So the hunk in mmots seems to be wrong in my eyes.
>
> Seems right - thanks for catching that.
>
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-use-css_get-put-when-charging-uncharging-kmem-fix-fix-fix
> +++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6409,7 +6409,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct c
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>
> memcg_destroy_kmem(memcg);
> - mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> + __mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> _
>
Hmm, if...
memcg-use-css_get-put-when-charging-uncharging-kmem-fix-fix.patch
...does not apply here, a follow-up makes not really sense to me...
memcg-use-css_get-put-when-charging-uncharging-kmem-fix-fix-fix.patch
Maybe, I am wrong seeing it from -next side than -mm.
( Might be you want to keep the chronology. )
Anyway, dunno, will fold that into -fix-fix.
- Sedat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
