* Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Introduced by commit 9a55fdbe941e ("x86, asmlinkage, paravirt: Add
> > > __visible/asmlinkage to xen paravirt ops"). The 2 definitions used to be
> > > identical ... maybe there should be only one.
> >
> > Andi, please send a fix for this build warning, against
> > tip:x86/asmlinkage.
>
> I resent the patch. Thanks for the headsup.
I suspect hpa missed it because the patch was opaque and
non-descriptive: the title talks about a 'warning' that is
supposedly fixed but the changelog does not explain what
warning it is and why the change matters.
Please use the customary changelog style we use in the
kernel:
" Current code does (A), this has a problem when (B).
We can improve this doing (C), because (D)."
I've seen this pattern of deficient changelogs a dozen
times in your patches this year alone ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
