Hi all, On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:42:09 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Introduced by commit 9a55fdbe941e ("x86, asmlinkage, paravirt: Add > > > > __visible/asmlinkage to xen paravirt ops"). The 2 definitions used to be > > > > identical ... maybe there should be only one. > > > > > > Andi, please send a fix for this build warning, against > > > tip:x86/asmlinkage. > > > > I resent the patch. Thanks for the headsup. > > I suspect hpa missed it because the patch was opaque and > non-descriptive: the title talks about a 'warning' that is > supposedly fixed but the changelog does not explain what > warning it is and why the change matters. > > Please use the customary changelog style we use in the > kernel: > > " Current code does (A), this has a problem when (B). > We can improve this doing (C), because (D)." > > I've seen this pattern of deficient changelogs a dozen > times in your patches this year alone ... Ping? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpW3H8LRBc8a.pgp
Description: PGP signature