Linux Next
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: strange commit in the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: tidy up of trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] staging/lustre/llite: get rid of backing_dev_info
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] staging/lustre/llite: get rid of backing_dev_info
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Aw: randconfig build error with next-20150121, in drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
- From: "Peter Huewe" <PeterHuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the sunxi tree
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: tidy up of trees
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the sunxi tree
- From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the sunxi tree
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the sunxi tree
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] staging/lustre/llite: get rid of backing_dev_info
- From: green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: tidy up of trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
- next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the sunxi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
- Re: compaction tracepoint broken with CONFIG_COMPACTION enabled
- From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
- compaction tracepoint broken with CONFIG_COMPACTION enabled (was: mmotm 2015-01-16-15-50 uploaded)
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-16-15-50 uploaded
- From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 ] staging: ft1000: fix else style error
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-16-15-50 uploaded
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-16-15-50 uploaded (netfilter xt_TPROXY.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-01-16-15-50 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget tree with the usb.current tree
- From: "Kaukab, Yousaf" <yousaf.kaukab@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree
- From: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget tree with the usb.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the wireless-drivers tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2 v3] kprobes: compile out IPMODIFY support if ftrace doesn't support it
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2 v3] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the renesas tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 15
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] kprobes: compile out IPMODIFY support if ftrace doesn't support it
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the renesas tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] next: drm/atomic: Use copy_from_user to copy 64 bit data from user space
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] kprobes: compile out IPMODIFY support if ftrace doesn't support it
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2 v2] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support (was Re: Re: livepatching tree for linux-next)
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 14
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support (was Re: Re: livepatching tree for linux-next)
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support (was Re: Re: livepatching tree for linux-next)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support (was Re: Re: livepatching tree for linux-next)
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 ] staging: ft1000: fix else style error
- From: Bilel DRIRA <bilel.dr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 13 (arm build failure)
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 13 (arm build failure)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150113, in sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150113, in drivers/pcmcia/rsrc_pci.c
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 13
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the char-misc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] next: drm/atomic: Use copy_from_user to copy 64 bit data from user space
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget tree with the usb.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget tree with the usb.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150112, in drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget-fixes tree with the usb.current tree
- From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drm/i915: fix build for CONFIG_BUG=n
- From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bf609: CONFIG_SND_BF6XX_PCM?
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget-fixes tree with the usb.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 9
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 8 (media, v4l2, vb2)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (microblaze qemu problems)
- From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (microblaze qemu problems)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-01-07-17-07 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (microblaze qemu problems)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Missing next-$date git-tag when pulled-in linux-next.git on top of linus.git
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next v2] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Missing next-$date git-tag when pulled-in linux-next.git on top of linus.git
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Missing next-$date git-tag when pulled-in linux-next.git on top of linus.git
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Missing next-$date git-tag when pulled-in linux-next.git on top of linus.git
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error fetching the microblaze tree
- From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error fetching the microblaze tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error fetching the microblaze tree
- From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 6
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: error fetching the microblaze tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 5
- From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 5
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 5
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: bad commit in the luto-misc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: bad commit in the luto-misc tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: bad commit in the luto-misc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20141231] sched: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2539 at kernel/sched/core.c:7303 __might_sleep+0xbd/0xd0()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20141231] sched: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2539 at kernel/sched/core.c:7303 __might_sleep+0xbd/0xd0()
- From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20141231] sched: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2539 at kernel/sched/core.c:7303 __might_sleep+0xbd/0xd0()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] scsi: bfa: bfad_bsg: Avoid memory overflow in bfad_iocmd_ioc_get_info()
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 3
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 31 (usb/dwc2)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 31
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 26 (f2fs)
- From: Changman Lee <cm224.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error while fetching the watchdog tree
- From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: missing merge fix for the access_once tree
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix handling of wait_for_completion_timeout result
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 26 (f2fs)
- From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 26 (f2fs)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 26 (sst-haswell-pcm)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 26
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: error while fetching the watchdog tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next v2] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next] drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c: Use 'uint64_t' instead of 'cycles_t' to avoid warnings
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: missing merge fix for the access_once tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: missing merge fix patch for the merge of the xen-tip tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: missing merge fix for the access_once tree
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: missing merge fix patch for the merge of the xen-tip tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: missing merge fix patch for the merge of the xen-tip tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: missing merge fix for the access_once tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- livepatching tree for linux-next
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141219, in drivers/input/misc/regulator-haptic.c
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the idle tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20141219, in drivers/input/misc/regulator-haptic.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] pwm: atmel-hlcdc: Prevent div by zero
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141204, in drivers/pwm
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] pwm: atmel-hlcdc: Prevent div by zero
- From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141204, in drivers/pwm
- From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141204, in drivers/pwm
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141204, in drivers/pwm
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm/rpc: avoid static keyword removal via define
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 18
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the modules tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: status of the logfs tree?
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm/rpc: avoid static keyword removal via define
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm/rpc: avoid static keyword removal via define
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm/rpc: avoid static keyword removal via define
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm/rpc: avoid static keyword removal via define
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 17
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ipmi tree
- From: Corey Minyard <minyard@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the ipmi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-12-15-17-05 uploaded
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
- [BUG, linux-next] spawn PID 1 without CLONE_FS, wireless inop
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm/rpc: avoid static keyword removal via define
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm/rpc: avoid static keyword removal via define
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
- From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the vfs tree
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
- From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
- From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the infiniband tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-12-15-17-05 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the watchdog tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arm/rpc: avoid static keyword removal via define
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/1] arm: Fix fallout from the access_once tree
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 15
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the commits in the vhost tree
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the watchdog tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the watchdog tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the watchdog tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: question about the commits in the vhost tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12 (net/bridge)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12 (sound/soc/codecs/rt5640)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141210, in drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141210, in drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet
- From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141210, in drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20141211, in drivers/media/usb/gspca
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 11
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: no linux-next today
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 10
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 10
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 10
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 10
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 10
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20141209, in sound/soc/codecs/rt5640.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the arm tree
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 9
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the thermal tree
- From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the thermal tree
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the thermal tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the spi tree
- From: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the spi tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the spi tree
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the spi tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the spi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tiny tree with the tip tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: status of the lzo-update tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the rcu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 5
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kselftest-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: rocker: Add select to CONFIG_BRIDGE in Kconfig
- From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 4
- From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: rocker: Add select to CONFIG_BRIDGE in Kconfig
- From: Andreas Ruprecht <mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: rocker: Add select to CONFIG_BRIDGE in Kconfig
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 4
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 4
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Please add git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git linux-next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: rocker: Add select to CONFIG_BRIDGE in Kconfig
- From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] net: ethernet: rocker: Add select to CONFIG_BRIDGE in Kconfig
- From: Andreas Ruprecht <mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- Please add git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git linux-next
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DT parsing : duplicate name error
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DT parsing : duplicate name error
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DT parsing : duplicate name error
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DT parsing : duplicate name error
- From: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DT parsing : duplicate name error
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest tree with the kselftest-fixes tree
- From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DT parsing : duplicate name error
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the regulator tree
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DT parsing : duplicate name error
- From: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DT parsing : duplicate name error
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest tree with the kselftest-fixes tree
- From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- DT parsing : duplicate name error
- From: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest tree with the kselftest-fixes tree
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 3
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest tree with the kselftest-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the regulator tree
- From: Romain Perier <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the omap_dss2 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the regulator tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the kselftest-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-12-02-15-55 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Linux next: boot on Wandboard broken by gic related change
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141201, in drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.c
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the pm tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Thermal: introduce INT3406 thermal driver
- From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux next: boot on Wandboard broken by gic related change
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Linux next: boot on Wandboard broken by gic related change
- From: Vincent <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 1
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] Thermal: int3406_thermal: solve the dependency build error
- From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ext4 tree
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sunxi tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Nov 28
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the devicetree tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Remove warning by including linux/irqdomain.h
- From: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the sunxi tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 27
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the mips tree
- From: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the vfs tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the kbuild tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Nov 27
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the pm, mfd and regulator trees
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the kbuild tree
- From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the kbuild tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the irqchip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-11-26-15-45 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141126, in drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c
- From: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20141126, in drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] of: remove select of non-existant OF_DEVICE config symbol
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Nov 26
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the kvm tree
- From: Christoffer Dall <christofferdall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the omap_dss2 tree
- From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the pm, mfd and regulator trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the i2c tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tiny tree with the tip tree
- From: josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the omap_dss2 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: [PATCH v8 5/8] of: i2c: Export single device registration method
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the vfs tree
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the omap_dss2 tree
- From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Nov 25
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the vfs tree
- From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the omap_dss2 tree
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the omap_dss2 tree
- From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tiny tree with the tip tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tiny tree with the tip tree
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tiny tree with the tip tree
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] cpu cache info in drivers base?
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tiny tree with the tip tree
- From: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tiny tree with the tip tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tiny tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/12] time: Rename udelay_test.c to test_udelay.c
- From: David Riley <davidriley@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make distclean problem with next-20141124?
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] cpu cache info in drivers base?
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the tegra tree
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] cpu cache info in drivers base?
- From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] usb:phy: propagate __of_usb_find_phy()'s error on failure
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] usb:phy: propagate __of_usb_find_phy()'s error on failure
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] usb:phy: propagate __of_usb_find_phy()'s error on failure
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- [-next] cpu cache info in drivers base?
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] usb:phy: propagate __of_usb_find_phy()'s error on failure
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] usb:phy: propagate __of_usb_find_phy()'s error on failure
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Nov 24
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm tree
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the tegra tree
- From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree
- From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the ftrace tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the v4l-dvb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the tegra tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the tegra tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the tegra tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the sunxi tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [tip:timers/core] time: Rename udelay_test.c to test_udelay.c
- From: tip-bot for John Stultz <tipbot@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/12] time: Rename udelay_test.c to test_udelay.c
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/12] time: Rename udelay_test.c to test_udelay.c
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20141121, in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_doorbell.c
- From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] amdkfd: explicitely include io.h in kfd_doorbell.c
- From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] amdkfd: explicitely include io.h in kfd_doorbell.c
- From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/12] time: Rename udelay_test.c to test_udelay.c
- From: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] media: pci: smipcie: Fix dependency for DVB_SMIPCIE
- From: Andreas Ruprecht <rupran@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] media: pci: smipcie: Fix dependency for DVB_SMIPCIE
- From: Andreas Ruprecht <rupran@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] media: pci: smipcie: Fix dependency for DVB_SMIPCIE
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] media: pci: smipcie: Fix dependency for DVB_SMIPCIE
- From: Andreas Ruprecht <rupran@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20141121, in drivers/media/pci/smipcie/smipcie.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Samba]
[Yosemite News]