Linux Next
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [PATCH] serial: mxs-auart: fix build failure due to broken goto statement
- From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
- From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the trivial tree
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fixup! serial: imx: add support for half duplex rs485
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tty tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fixup! serial: mctrl-gpio: simplify init routine
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fixup! serial: imx: add support for half duplex rs485
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fixup! serial: mctrl-gpio: simplify init routine
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tty tree
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the crypto tree
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the crypto tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the crypto tree
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Mar 10
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the crypto tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the trivial tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tty tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the trivial tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tty tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: no release on Monday
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150303, in drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (iwlwifi/mvm)
- From: Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Mar 6
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the virtio tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix undefined ioremap_huge_init when CONFIG_MMU is not set
- From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix build errors in asm-generic/pgtable.h
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (iwlwifi/mvm)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix undefined ioremap_huge_init when CONFIG_MMU is not set
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150305, in kernel/rcu
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150303, in drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20150305, in kernel/rcu
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix build errors in asm-generic/pgtable.h
- From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix undefined ioremap_huge_init when CONFIG_MMU is not set
- From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150303, in drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Mar 5
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-03-04-16-59 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150303, in drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c
- From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150303, in drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 4 (platform/chrome)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the thermal-soc tree
- From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 4 (build failures)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150303, in drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
- From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the thermal-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Mar 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the md tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the md tree
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20150303, in drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Mar 3
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the md tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150302, in drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_configfs.c
- From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [E1000-devel] randconfig build error with next-20150302, in drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_configfs.c
- From: Hisashi T Fujinaka <htodd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Mar 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the md tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the md tree
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the md tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 27 (microblaze build failure)
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 27 (microblaze build failure)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20150227, in drivers/rtc/rtc-abx805.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 27
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20150226, in sound/soc/intel/sst/sst_drv_interface.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- since-3.19 branch opened for mm git tree (was: Re: mmotm 2015-02-25-21-19 uploaded)
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-02-25-21-19 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 26
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the clk tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM only
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM and ARM64 only
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 25
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux 4.0-rc1 out..
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 24 (build failure due to 'GFS2: Allocate reservation during splice_write')
- From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM only
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 24 (build failure due to 'GFS2: Allocate reservation during splice_write')
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 24
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error fetching the ipmi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM and ARM64 only
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM and ARM64 only
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error fetching the ipmi tree
- From: Corey Minyard <minyard@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM only
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the hid tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM only
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM only
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 23 (rtc-ds1685)
- From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM only
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux 4.0-rc1 out..
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error fetching the ipmi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error fetching the ipmi tree
- From: Corey Minyard <minyard@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error fetching the ipmi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update for drm-intel.git branches
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 23 (rtc-ds1685)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM only
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] locking fixes
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux 4.0-rc1 out..
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux 4.0-rc1 out..
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 23
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error fetching the ipmi tree
- From: Corey Minyard <minyard@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: error fetching the ipmi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] iommu: Enable LPAE pagetable on ARM only
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 22
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 20
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [3.19-final|next-20150204] LTP OOM testsuite causes call-traces
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 18 (x86)
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 18 (x86)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: please don't start adding v3.21 stuff yet
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: please don't start adding v3.21 stuff yet
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 18 (x86)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (mips build failures)
- From: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (mips build failures)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (mips build failures)
- From: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 18
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
- From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the infiniband tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (i2c-designware-baytrail.c)
- From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (mips build failures)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (i2c-designware-baytrail.c)
- From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (i2c-designware-baytrail.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (mips build failures)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 17
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 16
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 16
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 16 (mips build errors due to MIPSR6 patches)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
- From: Yibin Gong <yibin.gong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (runtime failures and 'non-zero nr_pmds' messages)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (iio/magnetometer/ak8975.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (iio/magnetometer/ak8975.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (runtime failures and 'non-zero nr_pmds' messages)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: nfsd:xdr4.h: add missing conditional group CONFIG_NFSD_V3
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (runtime failures and 'non-zero nr_pmds' messages)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (nfsd)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: nfsd:xdr4.h: add missing conditional group CONFIG_NFSD_V3
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: nfsd:xdr4.h: add missing conditional group CONFIG_NFSD_V3
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: nfsd:xdr4.h: add missing conditional group CONFIG_NFSD_V3
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: nfsd:xdr4.h: add missing conditional group CONFIG_NFSD_V3
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with Linus' tree
- From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 13
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fs: nfsd:xdr4.h: add missing conditional group CONFIG_NFSD_V3
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fs: nfsd:xdr4.h: add missing conditional group CONFIG_NFSD_V3
- From: Bas Peters <baspeters93@xxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20150212, in arch/x86
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150209, in fs/nfs/client.c
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150209, in fs/nfs/client.c
- From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150209, in fs/nfs/client.c
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the modules tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 11
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- make mandocs build failure with next-20150210
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20150210, in fs/nfsd
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the nfs tree
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9 (build failures)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [3.19-final|next-20150204] LTP OOM testsuite causes call-traces
- From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] x86_64-add-kasan-support-fix
- From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 10
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Heads-up, last minutes changes in staging and tty trees.
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9 (build failures)
- From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the nfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150209, in arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20150209, in arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: Pat Erley <pat-lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9 (build failures)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 9
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20141231] sched: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2539 at kernel/sched/core.c:7303 __might_sleep+0xbd/0xd0()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: Pat Erley <pat-lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: Pat Erley <pat-lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: Pat Erley <pat-lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 1
- From: Pat Erley <pat-lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2 v2] tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/clk: Change rate from u32 to u64 in gk20a_pllg_calc_rate()
- From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/clk: Change rate from u32 to u64 in gk20a_pllg_calc_rate()
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] drm/nouveau/clk: Use plain "/" for 32-bit division
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update for drm-intel.git branches
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] drm/nouveau/clk: Use plain "/" for 32-bit division
- From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] drm/nouveau/clk: Use plain "/" for 32-bit division
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kasan: fix build warnings
- From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Update for drm-intel.git branches
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kasan: fix build warnings
- From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] kasan: fix build warnings
- From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] exynos/drm: fix no hdmi output
- From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] scsi_logging: return void for dev_printk() functions
- From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] ARC: Fix earlycon build breakage
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the sound tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] ARC: Fix earlycon build breakage
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] ARC: Fix earlycon build breakage
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] ARC: Fix earlycon build breakage
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] ARC: Fix earlycon build breakage
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-02-03-16-38 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 3 (arc:defconfig build failure)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Missing next-$date git-tag when pulled-in linux-next.git on top of linus.git
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Missing next-$date git-tag when pulled-in linux-next.git on top of linus.git
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] staging: ft1000: fix braces warning
- From: Bilel DRIRA <bilel.dr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Missing next-$date git-tag when pulled-in linux-next.git on top of linus.git
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] staging: ft1000: fix braces warning
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Missing next-$date git-tag when pulled-in linux-next.git on top of linus.git
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] staging: ft1000: fix braces warning
- From: bill <bilel.dr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] staging: ft1000: fix braces warning
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 3 (arc:defconfig build failure)
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] staging: ft1000: fix braces warning
- From: Bilel DRIRA <bilel.dr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 3 (arc:defconfig build failure)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Update for drm-intel.git branches
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 3
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (build failures due to 'don't offset memmap for flatmem')
- From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the fsl tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux 3.19-rc7
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (clk related WARNING on arm)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (clk related WARNING on arm)
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: libahci_platform has undefined symbol on sparc
- From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: libahci_platform has undefined symbol on sparc
- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: libahci_platform has undefined symbol on sparc
- From: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: remove remaining references to NUMA hinting bits and helpers -fix
- From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (clk related WARNING on arm)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (build failures)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (build failures)
- From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (build failures)
- From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] exynos/drm: fix no hdmi output
- From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (build failures)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mm: remove remaining references to NUMA hinting bits and helpers -fix
- From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] exynos/drm: fix no hdmi output
- From: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 30
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the spi tree
- From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm: reduce conflicts in Kcinfig.debug
- From: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the spi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arm: reduce conflicts in Kcinfig.debug
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-01-29-16-39 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] exynos/drm: fix no hdmi output
- From: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] exynos/drm: fix no hdmi output
- From: Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Hangs in libhugetlbfs tests in -next
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Hangs in libhugetlbfs tests in -next
- From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] arm64/efi: move SetVirtualAddressMap() to UEFI stub
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] arm64/efi: move SetVirtualAddressMap() to UEFI stub
- From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drm/bridge: sti_dvo: adapt to updated bridge API
- From: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
- From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 29
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the xen-tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150127, in drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
- From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- build fails: drm/bridge: make bridge registration independent of drm flow
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-27-16-19 uploaded (smack)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20150128, in drivers/gpu/drm/panel
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 28
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-01-27-16-19 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20150127, in drivers/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (build failures due to 'don't offset memmap for flatmem')
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make allyesconfig i386 build failure with next-20150122 (caused by fb_agm1264k-fl driver)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 27
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clockevents tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make allyesconfig i386 build failure with next-20150122 (caused by fb_agm1264k-fl driver)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm-panel tree with the drm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make allyesconfig i386 build failure with next-20150122 (caused by fb_agm1264k-fl driver)
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make allyesconfig i386 build failure with next-20150122 (caused by fb_agm1264k-fl driver)
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: contact change for the integrity tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: contact change for the integrity tree
- From: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: contact change for the integrity tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-01-23-16-19: build failures due to 'mm/page_alloc.c: don't offset memmap for flatmem'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-01-23-16-19 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20150123, in security/smack/smack_netfilter.c
- From: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 23
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Wei Huang <wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kvms390 tree for Linux next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kvms390 tree for Linux next
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kvms390 tree for Linux next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: remove obsolete documentation tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: remove obsolete documentation tree
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- sparc32: fix broken set_pte()
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- make allyesconfig i386 build failure with next-20150122
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- sparc32: fix broken set_pte()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- sparc32: fix broken set_pte()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- kvms390 tree for Linux next
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 22
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: strange commit in the mfd tree
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the rcu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the rcu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: strange commit in the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: tidy up of trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Add missing ifdef CONFIG_ACPI for pnp_acpi_device
- From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] staging/lustre/llite: get rid of backing_dev_info
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] staging/lustre/llite: get rid of backing_dev_info
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Aw: randconfig build error with next-20150121, in drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
- From: "Peter Huewe" <PeterHuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the sunxi tree
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: tidy up of trees
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the sunxi tree
- From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the sunxi tree
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc-uh tree with the sunxi tree
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] staging/lustre/llite: get rid of backing_dev_info
- From: green@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: tidy up of trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
- next-20150120 broken on Tegra by "ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators"
- From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
- From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20 -- Kernel panic - Unable to mount root fs
- From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)?
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Samba]
[Yosemite News]
