On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:13:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c: In function 'tk_is_cntvct':
> arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c:273:15: error: 'const struct timekeeper' has no member named 'tkr'
> if (strcmp(tk->tkr.clock->name, "arch_sys_counter") != 0)
> ^
> arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c: In function 'update_vsyscall':
> arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c:319:32: error: 'struct timekeeper' has no member named 'tkr'
> vdso_data->cs_cycle_last = tk->tkr.cycle_last;
> ^
> arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c:321:36: error: 'struct timekeeper' has no member named 'tkr'
> vdso_data->xtime_clock_snsec = tk->tkr.xtime_nsec;
> ^
> arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c:322:27: error: 'struct timekeeper' has no member named 'tkr'
> vdso_data->cs_mult = tk->tkr.mult;
> ^
> arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c:323:28: error: 'struct timekeeper' has no member named 'tkr'
> vdso_data->cs_shift = tk->tkr.shift;
> ^
> arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c:324:27: error: 'struct timekeeper' has no member named 'tkr'
> vdso_data->cs_mask = tk->tkr.mask;
> ^
>
> Caused by commit 876e78818def ("time: Rename timekeeper::tkr to
> timekeeper::tkr_mono") from the tip tree interacting with commit
> ecf99a439105 ("ARM: 8331/1: VDSO initialization, mapping, and
> synchronization") from the arm tree.
>
> I added this merge fix patch for today (is that all that is needed?):
I'll drop the VDSO stuff from the ARM tree; I can't see a way to keep
it in my tree and keep my tree buildable without dragging in the tip
tree.
The ARM VDSO stuff will just have to wait for 4.2 instead.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
