Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:23:13 +0100
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
> > Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >>
> >> Subject: x86/tbl/trace: ---> .../tlb/...
> >>
> >
> > But I wanted "To Be Loved".
> >
> 
> Sorry, the patch is not "applicable" :-)

How about, I wanted "x86 to be loved by trace"? Or vice versa.

Applicable then?

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux