On 02/18/2015 01:14 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:37:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Guenter,
[Add Ralf to cc]
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Build results:
total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12
Failed builds:
mips:defconfig
mips:allmodconfig
mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
mips:ath79_defconfig
mips:ar7_defconfig
mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
mips:e55_defconfig
mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
mips:malta_defconfig
sparc64:allmodconfig
mips builds are all failing with
Building mips:defconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log:
arch/mips/kernel/genex.S: Assembler messages:
arch/mips/kernel/genex.S:128: Error: Bad value (mips64r6) for internal use
arch/mips/kernel/genex.S:128: Error: unknown ISA level 64r6
This was introduced by commit 0bf705e94771800 ("MIPS: kernel: genex: Set
correct ISA level") which apparently assumes that only mips64r6 is a valid
ISA level, though it is obviously not supported on older compilers. This
is on top of the other mips r6 related build errors seen yesterday.
I really hope that this is not 3.20 material, given the lack of testing
with architectures other than mips r6 or with older compilers.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is just a typo I introduced yesterday by mistake. This has been fixed in
the meantime but it did not make it in today's linux-next.
Yes, but it is not the only r6 related bug. Did you fix all the others as well ?
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
