2015-04-07 11:28 GMT+02:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Matthias Brugger
> <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2015-04-07 3:12 GMT+02:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> In file included from arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi:18:0,
>>> from arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135-evbp1.dts:16:
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135-pinfunc.h:18:40: fatal error: dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h: No such file or directory
>>> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h>
>>> ^
>>>
>>> Caused by commit e6f219b8ec5e ("ARM: dts: mt8135: Add pinctrl/GPIO/EINT
>>> node for mt8135").
>>
>> This will be fixed as soon as Linus pinctrl for-next branch got merged [1].
>
> Hm that's unfortunate, we do not rely on merge orders.
>
> Either the ARM SoC tree needs to pull in the pinctrl commit
> or I need to carry this patch in the pinctrl tree.
>
> Is this sufficiently stand-alone to be merged into my tree
> or do you need to go by the former approach?
It's a standalone patch, so for me it is fine if you merge the patch
into your tree.
Thanks,
Matthias
--
motzblog.wordpress.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
