On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the regulator tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c: In function 'dsi_host_regulator_disable':
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c:330:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'regulator_set_optimum_mode' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> regulator_set_optimum_mode(s[i].consumer,
> ^
>
> Caused by commit a689554ba6ed ("drm/msm: Initial add DSI connector
> support") from the drm tree interacting with commit ae6e808f1574
> ("regulator: Drop temporary regulator_set_optimum_mode wrapper") from
> the regulator tree.
Thanks.. btw, would it be possible to get my msm-next branch picked up
by linux-next? That seems like it would help to catch these earlier..
git://people.freedesktop.org/~robclark/linux msm-next
BR,
-R
> This happens every time someone renames/changes an API :-(
>
> I have applied the following merge fix patch. Someone needs to make
> sure Linus finds out when the latter of these two trees is merged into
> his.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:28:42 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/msm: fixes for regulator_set_optimum_mode name change
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> index fdc54e3eff55..962cf545d24c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> @@ -327,8 +327,7 @@ static void dsi_host_regulator_disable(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host)
> DBG("");
> for (i = num - 1; i >= 0; i--)
> if (regs[i].disable_load >= 0)
> - regulator_set_optimum_mode(s[i].consumer,
> - regs[i].disable_load);
> + regulator_set_load(s[i].consumer, regs[i].disable_load);
>
> regulator_bulk_disable(num, s);
> }
> @@ -343,8 +342,8 @@ static int dsi_host_regulator_enable(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host)
> DBG("");
> for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> if (regs[i].enable_load >= 0) {
> - ret = regulator_set_optimum_mode(s[i].consumer,
> - regs[i].enable_load);
> + ret = regulator_set_load(s[i].consumer,
> + regs[i].enable_load);
> if (ret < 0) {
> pr_err("regulator %d set op mode failed, %d\n",
> i, ret);
> @@ -363,7 +362,7 @@ static int dsi_host_regulator_enable(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host)
>
> fail:
> for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> - regulator_set_optimum_mode(s[i].consumer, regs[i].disable_load);
> + regulator_set_load(s[i].consumer, regs[i].disable_load);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
