On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > As usual, the executive friendly graph is at > http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-) > > I haven't done these for a while, so I haven't included a previous > release for comparison. > > (No merge commits counted, next-20150209 was the last linux-next before > the merge window opened.) > > Commits in v4.0-rc1 (relative to v3.19): 8950 > Commits in next-20140804: 8279 [ CC Thorsten Leemhuis ] Hi Stephen, thank you for a statistical overview. It should be interesting and document the Linux-next development. Especially what came in from last -next release (release before v4.0-rc1) into v4.0-rc1 - as you write this was next-20150209. Is that a typo next-20*14*0804? How did you generate your statistcs (number of commits, top-ten, etc.)? Thorsten is doing a fantastic job by explaining what is going on in the Linux-kernel development in his "Kernel-Log" [1] article series (German). On the last page he describes how he extracted the "numbers" (please see [2]). May have a look at it? Personally, I don't like any of Linus' -rc1 release announcement (but I read them). What are the pearls - what is "worth mentioning" - what new stuff is worth testing (scripts/diffconfig last-stable-config latest-rc1-config)? As someone interested in Linux-kernel I expect to get these informations more "user-friendly". ( IMO, It is irresponsible that user walk through all commits or merge-commits. ) As a conclusion: I am interested in such statistics and thank you for this email. Thanks. Regards, - Sedat - [1] http://www.heise.de/open/kernel-log-3007.html [2] http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/Die-Neuerungen-von-Linux-3-19-2541595.html?artikelseite=3 > Commits with the same SHA1: 7492 > Commits with the same patch_id: 452 (1) > Commits with the same subject line: 70 (1) > > (1) not counting those in the lines above. > > So commits in -rc1 that were in next-20150209: 8014 89.5% > > Some breakdown of the list of extra commits (relative to next-20150209) > in -rc1: > > Top ten first word of commit summary: > > 103 mips > 79 staging > 37 drm > 32 lguest > 25 ib > 22 arm > 19 rdma > 19 input > 19 alsa > 18 sunrpc > > Top ten authors: > > 51 rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 50 markos.chandras@xxxxxxxxxx > 25 trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 21 leonid.yegoshin@xxxxxxxxxx > 19 hch@xxxxxx > 17 richard.alpe@xxxxxxxxxxxx > 16 abbotti@xxxxxxxxx > 15 zyan@xxxxxxxxxx > 15 arnd@xxxxxxxx > 14 dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx > > Top ten commiters: > > 81 gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 75 davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > 64 markos.chandras@xxxxxxxxxx > 59 rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 47 torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 43 roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 38 ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 31 trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 26 mingo@xxxxxxxxxx > 26 idryomov@xxxxxxxxx > > There are also 265 commits in next-20150209 that didn't make it into > v4.0-rc1. > > Top ten first word of commit summary: > > 25 rcu > 24 arm > 20 selftests > 19 mm > 11 arm-soc > 6 documentation > 5 tracing > 5 staging > 5 libceph > 5 ceph > > Top ten authors: > > 36 akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 34 paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 20 shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 11 olof@xxxxxxxxx > 9 minchan@xxxxxxxxxx > 7 rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx > 6 zyan@xxxxxxxxxx > 6 behanw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 5 tapaswenipathak@xxxxxxxxx > 4 namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Some of Andrew's patches are fixes for other patches in his tree (and > have been merged into those). > > Top ten commiters: > > 102 sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 35 paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 21 shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 11 olof@xxxxxxxxx > 10 idryomov@xxxxxxxxxx > 9 kgene@xxxxxxxxxx > 7 rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx > 7 behanw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 7 arnd@xxxxxxxx > 4 treding@xxxxxxxxxx > > Those commits by me are from the quilt series (mainly Andrew's mmotm > tree). > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
