Re: lies about URNs (was Re: Celebrating NAT)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It's probably better if we don't continue the conversation.   I don't really see the point in rehashing things that are 25 years old, and are now water under the bridge.   But neither did I think your statement should stand without being refuted.

You may now have the last word if you wish.

Keith

On 7/20/19 10:55 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Fix the damn subject line and apologize if you want to continue this conversation.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux