Re: Advertising WG adoption and WG LCs requests [was RE: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20 Jul 2023, at 16:31, John C Klensin wrote:

Third, I'm fascinated by Christian's idea of allowing someone to
subscribe to a "follow" list for a WG.  Let me try what might be
a different version of the same idea or perhaps a different one.
Suppose every WG had two mailing lists, the primary one as we
think about WG lists today (and have for many years) and a
subset list, almost Announce-like, that was expected to be about
WG events, not discussions.

FYI: There is a (unused by us) feature in Mailman called "topics" that could do exactly this with a WG lists: The chair could create an "announcement" topic, send messages to that topic, and subscribers could choose to subscribe only to that topic.

FWIW,

pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux