Re: Interim (and other) meeting guidelines versus openness, transparency, inclusion, and outreach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 7/17/2023 10:53 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
On 7/17/23 11:58, Carsten Bormann wrote:

We check WG consensus at WGLC, and IETF consensus at IETF last call.

Last Call is far too late to fix most problems that crop up. I don't like throwing out people's hard work, but we need better ways of making sure that WGs produce output that really is technically sound and respectful of a broad spectrum of interest.   LC is necessary but insufficient to do this.

There are three significant discussion opportunities before IETF last call: adopting the charter of the working group; working group adoption of a draft; and, working group last call of a draft. The charter discussions are already very public, and I assume that someone interested in the subject could contribute, and also decide to join the WG mailing list if interested.

I suppose we could somehow broadcast adoption calls and WG last calls to the IETF -- with a caveat that any discussion should be inside the working group. Discuss?

-- Christian Huitema




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux