On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 6:08 AM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 16-Jul-23 15:50, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> Why is attending biweekly con calls exclusionary?
It depends where one lives and whether one has a full-time occupation. But really the point isn't there, it's whether the result of such calls (which de facto are design team meetings, not WG sessions) is brought back to a genuine WG plenary, electronically or in person, for an effective debate.
I'd probably be more comfortable if these meetings were pitched as open design team meetings; that would make things clearer.
Are all IETF design_teams open? I experience close ones, and did our IETF procedure mention that the design_team MUST be open?
AB
