Am 10.02.2012 19:45, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > On 02/11/2012 12:09 AM, Scott Doty wrote: >> On 02/10/2012 10:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> >>> You're not supposed to be running Fedora on production servers. That is >>> not what it's for. >>> >> >> Sez who? >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Server > > Existence of such a page does not prove anything at all. Anyone can > create a SIG. It is just a matter of creating a wiki page. What > matters is whether it is active and whether any real work is being done > on it. I would suggest you take a closer look at that. Also every > distribution has certain traits that make it suitable for certain use > cases more than others. I know people who use Fedora on servers but it > it evident that it is not the primary focus of the distribution. so what is the reason fedora exists? Desktop? not really after KDE4.0/GNOME3 in the state it was released Server? you say no! so is it really supposed to be a irrelevant playgorund where things randomly throwed in to see how hard users are in taking problems? until Redhat gave the control to the community where nobody feels responsible for anything, nobody can be forced to do anything and everybody throws in changes wihout feeling responsible for the consequenses of his acting at all fedora WAS a rock solid distribution currently it seems to be only a playgorund for people which are only playing around and never really worked with compouters and never like to do
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
