On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 18:54 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 10.02.2012 18:49, schrieb Jef Spaleta: > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> no i can not because it is a one-shot thing to do "yum distro-sync" and so i > >> had no time for a bugrport while other more important things like mysqld were > >> horrible broken > > > > Let me strongly suggest, that unfiled problems will never get fixed > > because you cannot assume your workflow is part of anyone elses > > prerelease testing. > > Let me further stridently suggest that if you or any user insist on > > using an upgrade path which is stated as a matter of policy as > > unsupported > > so this policy has to be adopted to the real life damned > > you can i imagine you upgrade a virtual production server with > Preupgrade/Anaconda? this is only a bad joke while if Fedora > put more care in yum-upgrade and supports it this does well > while services are up You're not supposed to be running Fedora on production servers. That is not what it's for. I do this too, but when something in Fedora makes it a bit inconvenient, I don't whine and throw all my toys from the perambulator, because I know I'm using Fedora for something it's not entirely intended for, and so I accept the pain and deal with it. It's like using a Lamborghini as your daily runabout: you can do it, but you probably shouldn't whine about how LAMBORGHINIS SUCK if you chip the undercarriage on a speed bump. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
