Re: /usrmove?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:49 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > "The objectives of the Alpha release are to:
> >
> >    Publicly release installable media versions of a feature complete
> > test release
> >    Test accepted features of Fedora 17
> >    Identify as many F17Beta blocker bugs as possible
> >    Identify as many F17Blocker blocker bugs as possible"
> 
> And in this scope. Inability to upgrade would be such a Beta blocker, methinks.

Sure. But the above doesn't mean that beta and final blockers should be
*fixed* in Alpha (obviously not). The point is that the Alpha exists *in
order to be used for the discovery of bugs that will block Beta and
Final*. i.e., we need an Alpha release to test upgrading, find out that
it's broken, and file a bug that blocks the Beta release. :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux