Am 08.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Adam Williamson: > On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 12:49 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> "The objectives of the Alpha release are to: >>> >>> Publicly release installable media versions of a feature complete >>> test release >>> Test accepted features of Fedora 17 >>> Identify as many F17Beta blocker bugs as possible >>> Identify as many F17Blocker blocker bugs as possible" >> >> And in this scope. Inability to upgrade would be such a Beta blocker, methinks. > > Sure. But the above doesn't mean that beta and final blockers should be > *fixed* in Alpha (obviously not). The point is that the Alpha exists *in > order to be used for the discovery of bugs that will block Beta and > Final*. i.e., we need an Alpha release to test upgrading, find out that > it's broken, and file a bug that blocks the Beta release. :) why in the world do you need this if you STILL KNOW that something is exremely broken? this is useless - block ALPHA if you are aware of horrible broken things instead wasting peoples time with saying "we have a new alpha lpease test it"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
