On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > no i can not because it is a one-shot thing to do "yum distro-sync" and so i > had no time for a bugrport while other more important things like mysqld were > horrible broken Let me strongly suggest, that unfiled problems will never get fixed because you cannot assume your workflow is part of anyone elses prerelease testing. Let me further stridently suggest that if you or any user insist on using an upgrade path which is stated as a matter of policy as unsupported, that you no justification for assuming that the official testing will catch problems with it and thus you have no business complaining about it a year later. You best course of action when relying on an unsupported set of actions is to do your own testing, and report back deficiencies. If you are nice and polite and professional in the bugreports you have a chance that developers will do you a _favor_ and attempt to fix the problem in the _unsupported_ workflow. But if you do not file, and you do not test.... then well...adjust your workflow and avoid the unsupported actions and reduce the impedance mismatch with the fedora development process as it stands. -jef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
